A Gene Expression Signature in Diagnostic Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissue Predicts Overall Survival in Locally Advanced and Advanced Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma – a Correlative Study From the E2496 Intergroup Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 430 Introduction: 25–30% of patients with advanced stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) develop progressive disease despite treatment with ABVD. While more intensive upfront treatments, such as BEACOPP, result in a higher failure free survival, this comes at the expense of increased toxicity and morbidity. 10–15% of patients with advanced stage cHL will ultimately succumb to the disease, with similar outcomes using different upfront regimens likely reflecting the planned use of second-line high dose therapy. The International Prognostic Factors Project Score, a prognostic tool developed using freedom from progression of disease as the outcome, has been used in clinical practice and has guided clinical trials. We hypothesized that biological factors, as measured by gene expression profiling in pretreatment formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPET) samples, might provide a robust predictor of overall survival (OS). Method and Patients: NanoString technology was used to quantitate 261 mRNA species in diagnostic FFPET samples from patients in the Intergroup E2496 trial, which compares ABVD with Stanford V chemotherapy in locally advanced and advanced stage cHL. The 261 genes included individual genes and genes that represent cell and cellular process signatures that have been associated with outcome in cHL. Total RNA was extracted from whole section scrolls from the 309 FFPET blocks available. A penalized binary logistic regression model with leave-one-out cross validation was used to produce a parsimonious predictive model for OS. A threshold was selected that maximized the Chi square of the Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) test between the identified low and high risk groups. An independent cohort of patients with advanced stage cHL enriched for treatment failure, consisting of 59 patients from British Columbia treated with ABVD and 71 patients from Portugal treated with Stanford V, was used to test the generated model and threshold. Results: Gene expression of adequate quality was produced in 293 of the 309 samples (95%). At a median follow up of 5.3 years, 36 (12%) of the 293 patients had died. 51 genes were differentially expressed (t-test p < 0.05) with respect to OS, including genes that are part of macrophage, cytotoxic/NK cell and apoptosis signatures. A predictive model for OS was produced with an area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.73. The predictor identified a high-risk group, comprising 39% of the cohort, with a 77% estimated 5-year OS compared with 96% in the low risk group (Figure 1A, log-rank p < 0.0001). The predictor was validated in the independent cohort giving an AUC of the ROC curve of 0.73 and an estimated 5-year OS of 71% in the high-risk group compared with 91% in the low risk group (Figure 1B, log-rank p = 0.006). Discussion: We have produced a parsimonious gene expression-based predictor of OS in cHL, developed in, and applicable to, widely available FFPET using NanoString technology. The predictor identifies, at diagnosis, a clinically meaningful proportion of patients at significantly higher risk of death when treated with ABVD or Stanford V. Further evaluation of the gene expression signature with alternative treatments, ideally in the context of clinical trials, is needed to understand the impact of more intensive cytotoxic therapies versus novel targeted approaches. Disclosures: Horning: Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Connors:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».