MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2559772841 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.430.430

A Gene Expression Signature in Diagnostic Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissue Predicts Overall Survival in Locally Advanced and Advanced Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma – a Correlative Study From the E2496 Intergroup Trial

2011· article· en· W2559772841 on OpenAlexaff
David W. Scott, Fong Chun Chan, Fangxin Hong, Sanja Rogić, King Tan, Barbara Meissner, Pedro Farinha, Sandra J. Horning, Richard I. Fisher, Nancy L. Bartlett, Lois E. Shepherd, Joseph M. Connors, Aïda Botelho de Sousa, Brad S. Kahl, Leo I. Gordon, Christian Steidl, Randy D. Gascoyne

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOncologyMedicineABVDInternal medicineLog-rank testStage (stratigraphy)Proportional hazards modelClinical trialChemotherapyBiologyVincristine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 430 Introduction: 25–30% of patients with advanced stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) develop progressive disease despite treatment with ABVD. While more intensive upfront treatments, such as BEACOPP, result in a higher failure free survival, this comes at the expense of increased toxicity and morbidity. 10–15% of patients with advanced stage cHL will ultimately succumb to the disease, with similar outcomes using different upfront regimens likely reflecting the planned use of second-line high dose therapy. The International Prognostic Factors Project Score, a prognostic tool developed using freedom from progression of disease as the outcome, has been used in clinical practice and has guided clinical trials. We hypothesized that biological factors, as measured by gene expression profiling in pretreatment formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPET) samples, might provide a robust predictor of overall survival (OS). Method and Patients: NanoString technology was used to quantitate 261 mRNA species in diagnostic FFPET samples from patients in the Intergroup E2496 trial, which compares ABVD with Stanford V chemotherapy in locally advanced and advanced stage cHL. The 261 genes included individual genes and genes that represent cell and cellular process signatures that have been associated with outcome in cHL. Total RNA was extracted from whole section scrolls from the 309 FFPET blocks available. A penalized binary logistic regression model with leave-one-out cross validation was used to produce a parsimonious predictive model for OS. A threshold was selected that maximized the Chi square of the Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) test between the identified low and high risk groups. An independent cohort of patients with advanced stage cHL enriched for treatment failure, consisting of 59 patients from British Columbia treated with ABVD and 71 patients from Portugal treated with Stanford V, was used to test the generated model and threshold. Results: Gene expression of adequate quality was produced in 293 of the 309 samples (95%). At a median follow up of 5.3 years, 36 (12%) of the 293 patients had died. 51 genes were differentially expressed (t-test p < 0.05) with respect to OS, including genes that are part of macrophage, cytotoxic/NK cell and apoptosis signatures. A predictive model for OS was produced with an area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.73. The predictor identified a high-risk group, comprising 39% of the cohort, with a 77% estimated 5-year OS compared with 96% in the low risk group (Figure 1A, log-rank p < 0.0001). The predictor was validated in the independent cohort giving an AUC of the ROC curve of 0.73 and an estimated 5-year OS of 71% in the high-risk group compared with 91% in the low risk group (Figure 1B, log-rank p = 0.006). Discussion: We have produced a parsimonious gene expression-based predictor of OS in cHL, developed in, and applicable to, widely available FFPET using NanoString technology. The predictor identifies, at diagnosis, a clinically meaningful proportion of patients at significantly higher risk of death when treated with ABVD or Stanford V. Further evaluation of the gene expression signature with alternative treatments, ideally in the context of clinical trials, is needed to understand the impact of more intensive cytotoxic therapies versus novel targeted approaches. Disclosures: Horning: Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Connors:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→