High Efficiency Clinical Scale Selective Depletion of Alloreacting T Cells Using Expanded T Lymphocytes as Antigen-Presenting Cells and a TH9402-Based Photodepletion Technique in HLA-Mismatched and Matched Donor-Recipient Pairs.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Selective depletion (SD) is a strategy to eliminate host-reactive donor lymphocytes from blood stem cell allografts to prevent GVHD and maintain GVL-effects. As an alternative to CD25-immunotoxin-based SD, we investigated a photodepletion (PD) process, whereby allo-activated donor cells are labeled with a photosensitizing rhodamine-based dye, 4,5-dibromorhodamide 123 (TH9402), and exposed to visible light, which preferentially eliminates allo-activated dye-retaining cells. Stimulator cells were prepared from recipient-derived leukapheresis mononuclear cells (MNCs) and cultured using anti-CD3 and 100 IU IL-2/ml. Responder cells (leukapheresis MNCs) from 3 random HLA-mismatched volunteers and 3 HLA-matched sibling donors were cocultured 1:1 with irradiated stimulators for 3 days. Cultured cells were incubated with 7.5 μM TH9402, followed by dye-extrusion and exposure to 5 Joule light energy in the PD light source (Celmed Bioscience Inc., Canada) at 5x106 cells/ml in FEP plastic bags. Flow cytometry was performed before and after PD and included surface phenotyping for CD25 and intracellular staining for forkhead protein3 (foxp3). Depletion efficacy was studied by mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR) in mismatched pairs and by helper-T-lymphocyte precursor (HTLp) frequency assay in matched pairs. All six clinical-scale experiments provided sufficient reduction of allo-reactivity and retention of third party responses as measured against a pool of 5 donors. In mismatched pairs mean reduction of allo-reactivity was 703-fold (± 141) when compared to unmanipulated donors. Third-party responses were maintained, with a mean reduction of only 1.3 ± 0.15-fold (Figure A). In matched pairs alloreactivity was reduced below the “GVHD-threshold” of 1/100.000 whilst third party responses remained above 1/10.000 precursors (Figure B). Effective depletion was observed despite that fact that a small fraction of CD25+ T cells remained after PD. These were mainly CD4+CD25+ T cells (1.5 ± 1.1 % of CD4+) and very residual CD8+CD25+ T cells (0.3 ± 0.2 % of CD8+), and represented predominantly CD4+foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) which persisted after PD (1.4 ± 1.7 % of CD4+). This establishes a clinical scale PD process capable of highly efficient removal of alloreactive lymphocytes from mismatched and matched MLRs while maintaining desirable third party responses. As PD targets activation-based changes in MDR-1 that result in an altered dye efflux, the mechanism of action is distinct from surface-marker-based allodepletion (e.g. CD69, CD25). Thus, PD may overcome instability of activation-based surface marker expression resulting in more consistent and effective depletion. PD may further mitigate the risk of GVHD by conserving Tregs. This approach will now be tested in a clinical SD trial. Figure Figure.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».