High Efficiency Clinical Scale Selective Depletion of Alloreacting T Cells Using Expanded T Lymphocytes as Antigen-Presenting Cells and a TH9402-Based Photodepletion Technique in HLA-Mismatched and Matched Donor-Recipient Pairs.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Selective depletion (SD) is a strategy to eliminate host-reactive donor lymphocytes from blood stem cell allografts to prevent GVHD and maintain GVL-effects. As an alternative to CD25-immunotoxin-based SD, we investigated a photodepletion (PD) process, whereby allo-activated donor cells are labeled with a photosensitizing rhodamine-based dye, 4,5-dibromorhodamide 123 (TH9402), and exposed to visible light, which preferentially eliminates allo-activated dye-retaining cells. Stimulator cells were prepared from recipient-derived leukapheresis mononuclear cells (MNCs) and cultured using anti-CD3 and 100 IU IL-2/ml. Responder cells (leukapheresis MNCs) from 3 random HLA-mismatched volunteers and 3 HLA-matched sibling donors were cocultured 1:1 with irradiated stimulators for 3 days. Cultured cells were incubated with 7.5 μM TH9402, followed by dye-extrusion and exposure to 5 Joule light energy in the PD light source (Celmed Bioscience Inc., Canada) at 5x106 cells/ml in FEP plastic bags. Flow cytometry was performed before and after PD and included surface phenotyping for CD25 and intracellular staining for forkhead protein3 (foxp3). Depletion efficacy was studied by mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR) in mismatched pairs and by helper-T-lymphocyte precursor (HTLp) frequency assay in matched pairs. All six clinical-scale experiments provided sufficient reduction of allo-reactivity and retention of third party responses as measured against a pool of 5 donors. In mismatched pairs mean reduction of allo-reactivity was 703-fold (± 141) when compared to unmanipulated donors. Third-party responses were maintained, with a mean reduction of only 1.3 ± 0.15-fold (Figure A). In matched pairs alloreactivity was reduced below the “GVHD-threshold” of 1/100.000 whilst third party responses remained above 1/10.000 precursors (Figure B). Effective depletion was observed despite that fact that a small fraction of CD25+ T cells remained after PD. These were mainly CD4+CD25+ T cells (1.5 ± 1.1 % of CD4+) and very residual CD8+CD25+ T cells (0.3 ± 0.2 % of CD8+), and represented predominantly CD4+foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) which persisted after PD (1.4 ± 1.7 % of CD4+). This establishes a clinical scale PD process capable of highly efficient removal of alloreactive lymphocytes from mismatched and matched MLRs while maintaining desirable third party responses. As PD targets activation-based changes in MDR-1 that result in an altered dye efflux, the mechanism of action is distinct from surface-marker-based allodepletion (e.g. CD69, CD25). Thus, PD may overcome instability of activation-based surface marker expression resulting in more consistent and effective depletion. PD may further mitigate the risk of GVHD by conserving Tregs. This approach will now be tested in a clinical SD trial. Figure Figure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".