MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2791534718 · doi:10.21037/aes.2018.ab012

AB012. Retinopathy in a mouse model for Zellweger spectrum disorder

2018· article· en· W2791534718 sur OpenAlexaff
Catherine Argyriou, Anna Polosa, Bruno Cécyre, Erminia Di Pietro, Monica Hsieh, Jean‐François Bouchard, Pierre Lachapelle, Nancy Braverman

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnnals of Eye Science · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Établissements canadiensUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésZellweger syndromeRetinaRetinalPeroxisomal disorderBiologyVisual acuityInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyPathologyOphthalmologyReceptorPeroxisomeNeuroscience

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Zellweger spectrum disorder (ZSD) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in any one of 13 PEX genes whose protein products are required for peroxisome assembly. Retinopathy leading to blindness is one of the major untreatable handicaps faced by patients with ZSD but is not well characterized, and the requirement for peroxisomes in retinal health is unknown. To address this and to inform future therapeutic studies, we examined the progression of retinopathy in our murine model for the common PEX1-G843D allele. Methods: Retinal electrophysiology (ffERG) and histology were performed in a cohort of Pex1-G844D (equivalent to human G843D) mice from 2 to 32 wks. Visual acuity was assessed using optokinetics. The levels of PEX1-G843D protein, its binding partner Pex6, and its putative ligand Pex5 (the peroxisome enzyme receptor) in the retina were determined by immunoblotting. Peroxisome biochemical metabolites in the whole eye and retina were measured using LC/MSMS. Retinal immunohistochemistry was used to visualize various cell types. Results: Cone ffERG response in the mutants remained residual (5% that of control) regardless of age. Maximal rod-mediated responses (50–70% of control) was reached at 4–6 wks, and then progressively decreased with age. B-waves were affected more severely than a-waves, while high frequency ERG components (oscillatory potentials) are better preserved than low frequency components (a- and b-waves). Visual evoked potential was diminished at 32 weeks. Assessment of visual acuity using optokinetics showed low visual reflexes by 11–13 weeks of age. We found normal amounts of Pex1-G844D, Pex6, and Pex5 protein in retina, suggesting that the mutated protein is not degraded. Measurement of peroxisome metabolites showed elevated very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) and decreased plasmalogens in the whole eye, indicative of peroxisome dysfunction. In the retina, VLCFAs were not elevated, and only C22:6 (docosahexaenoic acid) was decreased of the plasmalogens measured. There were normal amounts and localization of Pex1-G844D and Pex6, as well as normal staining of rod cells, amacrine cells, horizontal cells, Müller cells, and synaptic layers. Cone cell and bipolar cell nuclei were preserved while their cell bodies extending to the OSL and OPL, or OPL to IPL, respectively, were absent. Staining for Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was present in mutant retinas, which could indicate photoreceptor degeneration, increased oxidative stress, and/or Müller cell de-differentiation. Peroxisomes were recently shown to cluster at the base of the OSL, which is continuously regenerated due to light exposure, and is likely to require several peroxisome-dependent processes. To examine a functional link between light exposure and visual impairment, we performed dark adaptation from 2–4 or 4–6 wks. However, there was no improvement in ERG responses in our mutant mice. Conclusions: In summary, we have shown that Pex1-G844D mice have poor functional vision and develop a progressive cone-rod retinal dystrophy. Thus far, cellular changes are found only in the cone cells and bipolar cells, which lack the necessary physical connections to receive and transfer light-induced signals. We determined that the mechanism(s) underlying the abnormal ERG response is not influenced by light exposure. This murine natural history study allows us to pinpoint ages and accurate clinical endpoints for therapeutic interventions. It will also guide us in future studies of human retinal degeneration in ZSD.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,408

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,330
Écart entre enseignants0,300 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnnals of Eye ScienceMême sujetPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsTravaux en français237 207