MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791534718 · doi:10.21037/aes.2018.ab012

AB012. Retinopathy in a mouse model for Zellweger spectrum disorder

2018· article· en· W2791534718 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Argyriou, Anna Polosa, Bruno Cécyre, Erminia Di Pietro, Monica Hsieh, Jean‐François Bouchard, Pierre Lachapelle, Nancy Braverman

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Eye Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZellweger syndromeRetinaRetinalPeroxisomal disorderBiologyVisual acuityInternal medicineMedicineEndocrinologyPathologyOphthalmologyReceptorPeroxisomeNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Zellweger spectrum disorder (ZSD) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in any one of 13 PEX genes whose protein products are required for peroxisome assembly. Retinopathy leading to blindness is one of the major untreatable handicaps faced by patients with ZSD but is not well characterized, and the requirement for peroxisomes in retinal health is unknown. To address this and to inform future therapeutic studies, we examined the progression of retinopathy in our murine model for the common PEX1-G843D allele. Methods: Retinal electrophysiology (ffERG) and histology were performed in a cohort of Pex1-G844D (equivalent to human G843D) mice from 2 to 32 wks. Visual acuity was assessed using optokinetics. The levels of PEX1-G843D protein, its binding partner Pex6, and its putative ligand Pex5 (the peroxisome enzyme receptor) in the retina were determined by immunoblotting. Peroxisome biochemical metabolites in the whole eye and retina were measured using LC/MSMS. Retinal immunohistochemistry was used to visualize various cell types. Results: Cone ffERG response in the mutants remained residual (5% that of control) regardless of age. Maximal rod-mediated responses (50–70% of control) was reached at 4–6 wks, and then progressively decreased with age. B-waves were affected more severely than a-waves, while high frequency ERG components (oscillatory potentials) are better preserved than low frequency components (a- and b-waves). Visual evoked potential was diminished at 32 weeks. Assessment of visual acuity using optokinetics showed low visual reflexes by 11–13 weeks of age. We found normal amounts of Pex1-G844D, Pex6, and Pex5 protein in retina, suggesting that the mutated protein is not degraded. Measurement of peroxisome metabolites showed elevated very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) and decreased plasmalogens in the whole eye, indicative of peroxisome dysfunction. In the retina, VLCFAs were not elevated, and only C22:6 (docosahexaenoic acid) was decreased of the plasmalogens measured. There were normal amounts and localization of Pex1-G844D and Pex6, as well as normal staining of rod cells, amacrine cells, horizontal cells, Müller cells, and synaptic layers. Cone cell and bipolar cell nuclei were preserved while their cell bodies extending to the OSL and OPL, or OPL to IPL, respectively, were absent. Staining for Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was present in mutant retinas, which could indicate photoreceptor degeneration, increased oxidative stress, and/or Müller cell de-differentiation. Peroxisomes were recently shown to cluster at the base of the OSL, which is continuously regenerated due to light exposure, and is likely to require several peroxisome-dependent processes. To examine a functional link between light exposure and visual impairment, we performed dark adaptation from 2–4 or 4–6 wks. However, there was no improvement in ERG responses in our mutant mice. Conclusions: In summary, we have shown that Pex1-G844D mice have poor functional vision and develop a progressive cone-rod retinal dystrophy. Thus far, cellular changes are found only in the cone cells and bipolar cells, which lack the necessary physical connections to receive and transfer light-induced signals. We determined that the mechanism(s) underlying the abnormal ERG response is not influenced by light exposure. This murine natural history study allows us to pinpoint ages and accurate clinical endpoints for therapeutic interventions. It will also guide us in future studies of human retinal degeneration in ZSD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Eye ScienceSame topicPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207