“What Is Islamic About Slavery in Muslim Societies?” Cooper, Concubinage and Contemporary Legacies of ‘Islamic Slavery’ in North, West and East Africa
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
“What is Islamic about slavery in an Islamic society in Africa?”, historian Frederick Cooper asked in 1981. He explored the answer in terms of how Islam acted as a hegemonic ideology in nineteenth-century East Africa, drawing both masters and slaves into its legal and cultural world view. Almost forty years later, McDougall argues that Cooper’s question is still central; we have not yet fully understood the role gender played in this process. She asks: “How did the experience of being female, rather than male, shape the reality of Muslim masters’ and slaves’ lives?” Cooper had also reminded us that slavery was an institution shaped by a dynamic between owners and owned. Since, research in a variety of Muslim societies has revealed other networks of relationships between slaves and slaves, and slaves and freed slaves, for example, that are also ‘gendered’ in essence but almost invisible if viewed only through frameworks focused on dichotomies of power.McDougall’s exploration of these realities and relationships is based on oral histories of female masters, slaves and concubines from the author’s fieldwork in Morocco and Mauritania, alongside published accounts by M.G. Smith (Northern Nigeria) and Margaret Strobel (East Africa). Her focus on the household highlights the role of mistresses in managing the labour and lives of their slaves, often including intra-slave/freed slaves’ marriages, habitation, birth and other rituals, while always necessitating responsibility for ensuring early Islamic education and morality. The controversial notion of ‘constructed kin’ is invoked in this context, not only between mistresses and slaves but between slaves and freed slaves themselves. The focus on the concubine argues that the elusive element of what makes Islamic slavery Islamic may be in large part located in this core female-slave legal status—“the most detailed area of social life in Islamic texts” (Cooper). The stories reveal differences in how individual masters and mistresses treated concubines and their legitimate offspring, as well as between ‘customary practices’ that inserted themselves locally into religion. But most importantly, they illuminate a widely shared understanding that the concubine articulated a crucial intersection between Islam, slavery and society that has left a living legacy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».