MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897379379 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-59755-7_2

“What Is Islamic About Slavery in Muslim Societies?” Cooper, Concubinage and Contemporary Legacies of ‘Islamic Slavery’ in North, West and East Africa

2018· book-chapter· en· W2897379379 on OpenAlexaff
E. Ann McDougall

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamContext (archaeology)HegemonyDichotomyGender studiesIdeologyPower (physics)SociologyHistoryReligious studiesPolitical scienceLawPoliticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“What is Islamic about slavery in an Islamic society in Africa?”, historian Frederick Cooper asked in 1981. He explored the answer in terms of how Islam acted as a hegemonic ideology in nineteenth-century East Africa, drawing both masters and slaves into its legal and cultural world view. Almost forty years later, McDougall argues that Cooper’s question is still central; we have not yet fully understood the role gender played in this process. She asks: “How did the experience of being female, rather than male, shape the reality of Muslim masters’ and slaves’ lives?” Cooper had also reminded us that slavery was an institution shaped by a dynamic between owners and owned. Since, research in a variety of Muslim societies has revealed other networks of relationships between slaves and slaves, and slaves and freed slaves, for example, that are also ‘gendered’ in essence but almost invisible if viewed only through frameworks focused on dichotomies of power.McDougall’s exploration of these realities and relationships is based on oral histories of female masters, slaves and concubines from the author’s fieldwork in Morocco and Mauritania, alongside published accounts by M.G. Smith (Northern Nigeria) and Margaret Strobel (East Africa). Her focus on the household highlights the role of mistresses in managing the labour and lives of their slaves, often including intra-slave/freed slaves’ marriages, habitation, birth and other rituals, while always necessitating responsibility for ensuring early Islamic education and morality. The controversial notion of ‘constructed kin’ is invoked in this context, not only between mistresses and slaves but between slaves and freed slaves themselves. The focus on the concubine argues that the elusive element of what makes Islamic slavery Islamic may be in large part located in this core female-slave legal status—“the most detailed area of social life in Islamic texts” (Cooper). The stories reveal differences in how individual masters and mistresses treated concubines and their legitimate offspring, as well as between ‘customary practices’ that inserted themselves locally into religion. But most importantly, they illuminate a widely shared understanding that the concubine articulated a crucial intersection between Islam, slavery and society that has left a living legacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207