Mosunetuzumab, a Full-Length Bispecific CD20/CD3 Antibody, Displays Clinical Activity in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): Interim Safety and Efficacy Results from a Phase 1 Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Mosunetuzumab is a full-length bispecific CD20/CD3 antibody that redirects endogenous T-cells to kill malignant B-cells by concomitantly binding to CD3 on T-cells and CD20 on B-cells. We report results of an ongoing multicenter Phase 1/1b study (NCT02500407) evaluating mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell NHL patients (pts). Methods: Pts received mosunetuzumab intravenously (IV) as follows: Group A, mosunetuzumab administered on day (D) 1 of each 21-day cycle (C); and Group B, ascending doses of mosunetuzumab administered on D1, D8, and D15 of C1, then at a fixed dose on D1 of every 21-day cycle thereafter, up to a maximum of 17 cycles. Single-pt dose escalation converting to a 3+3 design was used in Group A; standard 3+3 escalation was used in Group B. Additional pts were enrolled to further characterize clinical activity at cleared dose levels. Primary outcome measures are maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and best objective response. Results: As of 13 April 2018, 98 pts were enrolled to receive mosunetuzumab (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL]/transformed [tr] follicular lymphoma [FL] n=55, FL n=29, mantle cell lymphoma n=3; other NHL n=11; Table 1). The median duration of treatment was 81 days (range 8-162 days) in Group A and 68 days (range 1-306 days) in Group B. 26 pts remain on treatment and 18 completed treatment, of whom 10 remain in follow-up. 54 pts (55%) discontinued treatment due to disease progression (n=43, 44%), withdrawal of consent (n=5, 5%), adverse events (AEs) (n=2, 2%), use of another anticancer agent (n=2, 2%), physician decision (n=1, 1%) or death (n=1, 1%; hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis). Doses up to 2.8mg were assessed in Group A (n=33) and up to 1.0/2.0/13.5mg in Group B (the C1D1/C1D8/C1D15 dose; subsequent doses = C1D15 dose; n=65). DLTs were reported in 6 pts: neutropenia (n=2, both grade 4), cytokine release syndrome (CRS; n=1, grade 2), increased liver transaminases (grade 4) and hepatic encephalopathy (grade 3) (n=1), hypotension (n=1, grade 3) and anemia (n=1, grade 3). The MTD has not yet been reached in either group. Safety was similar in both groups even with higher dose levels tested in Group B (Table 2). The majority of treatment-emergent AEs occurred during Cycle 1. CRS was the most frequently reported drug-related AE; occurred in 21/98 (21%) pts and mostly occurred with the first dose. All cases of CRS were grade 1-2 per Lee et al. (Blood 2014) grading criteria. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 51/98 (52%) pts, of which 22/98 (22%) were considered treatment-related. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent neutropenia was observed in 13/98 (13%) pts. One case of febrile neutropenia was reported (assessed as unrelated to study drug); no neutropenia-related infections were reported. Only one treatment-related grade ≥3 neurotoxicity was reported (grade 3 hepatic encephalopathy). One fatality from hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in a pt with suspected chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection was attributed to study treatment and one pt died of hepatic failure 26 days after the first dose; considered possibly related to treatment. Mosunetuzumab displayed a half-life of 6-11 days. Pharmacodynamic activity was evident from peripheral CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell activation following mosunetuzumab administration. Mosunetuzumab exhibited anti-tumor activity at doses ≥1.2mg (Figure 1). Among pts receiving doses ≥1.2mg, 66 patients (18 FL, 39 DLBCL/trFL and 9 other histologies) had at least 3-month follow-up and were considered efficacy-evaluable. Objective responses were observed in 27/66 (41%) evaluable pts, including 11/18 (61%) FL pts and 13/39 (33%) DLBCL/ trFL. 18 pts (27%) had a complete response (CR), including 50% (9/18) of FL pts and 21% (8/39) of DLBCL/trFL pts. Responses were observed in pts considered refractory to anti-CD20 therapy and in pts who had relapsed following CD19-directed CAR-T therapy. CRs appear durable, with all pts achieving a CR remaining in remission (median follow-up 372 days, range 95- 690 days). Conclusions: Mosunetuzumab is clinically active in R/R B-cell NHL. The safety profile, with MTD not yet reached and with most AEs being low-grade and manageable, appears favorable compared to current standard anti-lymphoma therapies including T-cell directed agents. Mosunetuzumab monotherapy shows promising and durable efficacy in FL and in DLBCL. Disclosures Sehn: Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria. Assouline:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Flinn:Agios: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; ArQule: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding. Isufi:Genentech: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Kim:Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Celltrion: Honoraria, Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Matasar:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Nastoupil:Karus: Research Funding; TG Therappeutics: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding. Hernandez:Genentech: Employment. Li:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kulkarni:Genentech: Employment. McCall:Genentech: Employment. McClellan:Genentech: Employment. Yin:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gupta:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chu:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bartlett:Millennium: Research Funding; ImaginAB: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».