MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900733038 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-118344

Mosunetuzumab, a Full-Length Bispecific CD20/CD3 Antibody, Displays Clinical Activity in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): Interim Safety and Efficacy Results from a Phase 1 Study

2018· article· en· W2900733038 on OpenAlexaff
Lihua E. Budde, Laurie H. Sehn, Sarit Assouline, Ian W. Flinn, Iris Isufi, Sung‐Soo Yoon, Won-Seog Kim, Matthew J. Matasar, Loretta J. Nastoupil, Raoul Santiago, Youngil Koh, Genevive Hernandez, Chi‐Chung Li, Priya R Kulkarni, Bruce McCall, Scott McClellan, Shen Yin, Vinita Gupta, Yu‐Waye Chu, Nancy L. Bartlett

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalSpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityMantle cell lymphomaInternal medicineFollicular lymphomaCD20LymphomaGastroenterologyRituximabRefractory (planetary science)Adverse effectBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Mosunetuzumab is a full-length bispecific CD20/CD3 antibody that redirects endogenous T-cells to kill malignant B-cells by concomitantly binding to CD3 on T-cells and CD20 on B-cells. We report results of an ongoing multicenter Phase 1/1b study (NCT02500407) evaluating mosunetuzumab in relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell NHL patients (pts). Methods: Pts received mosunetuzumab intravenously (IV) as follows: Group A, mosunetuzumab administered on day (D) 1 of each 21-day cycle (C); and Group B, ascending doses of mosunetuzumab administered on D1, D8, and D15 of C1, then at a fixed dose on D1 of every 21-day cycle thereafter, up to a maximum of 17 cycles. Single-pt dose escalation converting to a 3+3 design was used in Group A; standard 3+3 escalation was used in Group B. Additional pts were enrolled to further characterize clinical activity at cleared dose levels. Primary outcome measures are maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and best objective response. Results: As of 13 April 2018, 98 pts were enrolled to receive mosunetuzumab (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL]/transformed [tr] follicular lymphoma [FL] n=55, FL n=29, mantle cell lymphoma n=3; other NHL n=11; Table 1). The median duration of treatment was 81 days (range 8-162 days) in Group A and 68 days (range 1-306 days) in Group B. 26 pts remain on treatment and 18 completed treatment, of whom 10 remain in follow-up. 54 pts (55%) discontinued treatment due to disease progression (n=43, 44%), withdrawal of consent (n=5, 5%), adverse events (AEs) (n=2, 2%), use of another anticancer agent (n=2, 2%), physician decision (n=1, 1%) or death (n=1, 1%; hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis). Doses up to 2.8mg were assessed in Group A (n=33) and up to 1.0/2.0/13.5mg in Group B (the C1D1/C1D8/C1D15 dose; subsequent doses = C1D15 dose; n=65). DLTs were reported in 6 pts: neutropenia (n=2, both grade 4), cytokine release syndrome (CRS; n=1, grade 2), increased liver transaminases (grade 4) and hepatic encephalopathy (grade 3) (n=1), hypotension (n=1, grade 3) and anemia (n=1, grade 3). The MTD has not yet been reached in either group. Safety was similar in both groups even with higher dose levels tested in Group B (Table 2). The majority of treatment-emergent AEs occurred during Cycle 1. CRS was the most frequently reported drug-related AE; occurred in 21/98 (21%) pts and mostly occurred with the first dose. All cases of CRS were grade 1-2 per Lee et al. (Blood 2014) grading criteria. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 51/98 (52%) pts, of which 22/98 (22%) were considered treatment-related. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent neutropenia was observed in 13/98 (13%) pts. One case of febrile neutropenia was reported (assessed as unrelated to study drug); no neutropenia-related infections were reported. Only one treatment-related grade ≥3 neurotoxicity was reported (grade 3 hepatic encephalopathy). One fatality from hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in a pt with suspected chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection was attributed to study treatment and one pt died of hepatic failure 26 days after the first dose; considered possibly related to treatment. Mosunetuzumab displayed a half-life of 6-11 days. Pharmacodynamic activity was evident from peripheral CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell activation following mosunetuzumab administration. Mosunetuzumab exhibited anti-tumor activity at doses ≥1.2mg (Figure 1). Among pts receiving doses ≥1.2mg, 66 patients (18 FL, 39 DLBCL/trFL and 9 other histologies) had at least 3-month follow-up and were considered efficacy-evaluable. Objective responses were observed in 27/66 (41%) evaluable pts, including 11/18 (61%) FL pts and 13/39 (33%) DLBCL/ trFL. 18 pts (27%) had a complete response (CR), including 50% (9/18) of FL pts and 21% (8/39) of DLBCL/trFL pts. Responses were observed in pts considered refractory to anti-CD20 therapy and in pts who had relapsed following CD19-directed CAR-T therapy. CRs appear durable, with all pts achieving a CR remaining in remission (median follow-up 372 days, range 95- 690 days). Conclusions: Mosunetuzumab is clinically active in R/R B-cell NHL. The safety profile, with MTD not yet reached and with most AEs being low-grade and manageable, appears favorable compared to current standard anti-lymphoma therapies including T-cell directed agents. Mosunetuzumab monotherapy shows promising and durable efficacy in FL and in DLBCL. Disclosures Sehn: Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria. Assouline:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Flinn:Agios: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; ArQule: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding. Isufi:Genentech: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Kim:Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Celltrion: Honoraria, Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Eisai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Matasar:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Nastoupil:Karus: Research Funding; TG Therappeutics: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding. Hernandez:Genentech: Employment. Li:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kulkarni:Genentech: Employment. McCall:Genentech: Employment. McClellan:Genentech: Employment. Yin:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gupta:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chu:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bartlett:Millennium: Research Funding; ImaginAB: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207