MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2912471182 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-119128

Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 3 (S1PR3) Promotes Myeloid Commitment of Human Hematopoietic and Leukemic Stem Cells

2018· article· en· W2912471182 sur OpenAlexaff
Stephanie Z. Xie, Kerstin B. Kaufmann, Olga I. Gan, Elisa Laurenti, Stanley Ng, Qiang Liu, Melissa Kleinau, Joseph Jargostf, Gareth D. Holmes, Chiara Luberto, Lina M. Obeid, Yusuf A. Hannun, Jean Wang, Mark D. Minden, John E. Dick

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueSphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyStem cellHaematopoiesisMyeloidCell biologyProgenitor cellMyelopoiesisCD34S1PR1LymphopoiesisMyeloid leukemiaHematopoietic stem cellImmunologyCancer research

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Understanding the mechanisms underlying the abnormal differentiation of human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may reveal novel therapies to eradicate leukemic stem cells (LSC), which are often resistant to standard treatments and contribute to relapse. Cellular metabolism is recognized as a hallmark of cancer and is known to be distinct between hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) and downstream progenitors. In particular, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive lipid produced from sphingolipid metabolism that regulates proliferation and survival and is implicated in HSC egress, lymphocyte trafficking and mouse lymphoid lineage determination primarily through binding to S1PR1, one of five S1P G-protein coupled receptors. However, sphingolipids are understudied in human LSC and HSC. We recently found that sphingolipid perturbation governs HSC self-renewal and influences lineage outcome. Here, we show that S1PR3 governs myeloid commitment of LSC in a subset of human AML and is thus an attractive therapeutic target. Lipidomic analysis of LSC+ and LSC‒ fractions derived from AML patient samples and validated by xenotransplantation assays showed distinct sphingolipid alterations when compared to each other and to normal human cord blood (CB) CD34+CD38‒ stem cells and CD34+CD38+ progenitor populations. Interestingly, LSC+ fractions have increased S1P levels, prompting us to wonder if S1P signaling contributes to LSC maintenance. To gain a better understanding of the role of S1P in stemness, we examined S1P signaling in normal CB. Analysis of gene expression of S1PR1-5 and S1P transporters (SPNS2 and MFSD2B) within a comprehensive transcriptional roadmap of human hematopoiesis comprising thirteen normal populations from HSC to mature blood lineages demonstrated distinct expression patterns in specific blood lineages. S1PR1 and MFSD2B were most highly expressed in lymphoid and erythroid lineages, respectively, consistent with murine data. Notably, S1PR3 expression is specific to mature monocytes and granulocytes in human CB. S1PR3 protein was absent from the surface of long-term (LT) and short-term (ST)-HSC as determined by flow cytometry. Remarkably, lentiviral overexpression (OE) of S1PR3 was sufficient to promote myelopoiesis at the expense of erythropoiesis from LT- and ST-HSC in vitro in liquid culture, single cell assays and colony forming assays. To ascertain the mechanisms promoting myeloid commitment, we performed gene expression profiling by RNA-seq of LT- and ST-HSC following S1PR3 OE. This yielded a subset of shared genes similarly upregulated following S1PR3 OE relative to controls, including the known myeloid differentiation and AML-associated factors Early Growth Response 1 and 2 (EGR1/2) and Tribbles 1 (TRIB1). Thus, promiscuous expression of S1PR3 promotes a myeloid fate program in human HSC. S1PR3 protein expression was higher in AML patient samples relative to human CB and bone marrow cells by flow cytometry. Bioinformatic analysis of three independent AML cohorts revealed that AML patient samples with high S1PR3 gene expression also had high EGR2 and TRIB1 expression. Limiting dilution xenotransplantation assays of LSC-containing fractions sorted based on surface expression of S1PR3 demonstrated lower LSC frequency in S1PR3high versus S1PR3low/- LSC fractions. Moreover, S1PR3 OE in LSC+ fractions virtually abolished leukemic engraftment in xenotranplantation assays. These results suggest that higher S1PR3 levels in LSC are associated with a more mature myeloid state and that further increasing S1PR3 levels disrupts LSC maintenance. Treatment of mice bearing primary AML xenografts with FTY720, a S1P mimetic that targets S1P receptors including S1PR3, decreased leukemia burden in a subset of patient samples tested, including those obtained from relapsed and treatment-refractory patients. 70% of AML samples tested showed decreased LSC frequency in serial repopulation assays following FTY720 treatment. Importantly, treatment with FTY720 did not alter normal hematopoietic xenografts, demonstrating the existence of a therapeutic window. Collectively, our results provide the first direct evidence that sphingolipids govern myeloid commitment in human HSC and LSC, and demonstrate the potential of S1PR3 as a novel therapeutic target in AML for eradication of LSC while sparing HSC. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetSphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingTravaux en français237 207