MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912471182 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-119128

Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 3 (S1PR3) Promotes Myeloid Commitment of Human Hematopoietic and Leukemic Stem Cells

2018· article· en· W2912471182 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie Z. Xie, Kerstin B. Kaufmann, Olga I. Gan, Elisa Laurenti, Stanley Ng, Qiang Liu, Melissa Kleinau, Joseph Jargostf, Gareth D. Holmes, Chiara Luberto, Lina M. Obeid, Yusuf A. Hannun, Jean Wang, Mark D. Minden, John E. Dick

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyStem cellHaematopoiesisMyeloidCell biologyProgenitor cellMyelopoiesisCD34S1PR1LymphopoiesisMyeloid leukemiaHematopoietic stem cellImmunologyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Understanding the mechanisms underlying the abnormal differentiation of human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may reveal novel therapies to eradicate leukemic stem cells (LSC), which are often resistant to standard treatments and contribute to relapse. Cellular metabolism is recognized as a hallmark of cancer and is known to be distinct between hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) and downstream progenitors. In particular, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive lipid produced from sphingolipid metabolism that regulates proliferation and survival and is implicated in HSC egress, lymphocyte trafficking and mouse lymphoid lineage determination primarily through binding to S1PR1, one of five S1P G-protein coupled receptors. However, sphingolipids are understudied in human LSC and HSC. We recently found that sphingolipid perturbation governs HSC self-renewal and influences lineage outcome. Here, we show that S1PR3 governs myeloid commitment of LSC in a subset of human AML and is thus an attractive therapeutic target. Lipidomic analysis of LSC+ and LSC‒ fractions derived from AML patient samples and validated by xenotransplantation assays showed distinct sphingolipid alterations when compared to each other and to normal human cord blood (CB) CD34+CD38‒ stem cells and CD34+CD38+ progenitor populations. Interestingly, LSC+ fractions have increased S1P levels, prompting us to wonder if S1P signaling contributes to LSC maintenance. To gain a better understanding of the role of S1P in stemness, we examined S1P signaling in normal CB. Analysis of gene expression of S1PR1-5 and S1P transporters (SPNS2 and MFSD2B) within a comprehensive transcriptional roadmap of human hematopoiesis comprising thirteen normal populations from HSC to mature blood lineages demonstrated distinct expression patterns in specific blood lineages. S1PR1 and MFSD2B were most highly expressed in lymphoid and erythroid lineages, respectively, consistent with murine data. Notably, S1PR3 expression is specific to mature monocytes and granulocytes in human CB. S1PR3 protein was absent from the surface of long-term (LT) and short-term (ST)-HSC as determined by flow cytometry. Remarkably, lentiviral overexpression (OE) of S1PR3 was sufficient to promote myelopoiesis at the expense of erythropoiesis from LT- and ST-HSC in vitro in liquid culture, single cell assays and colony forming assays. To ascertain the mechanisms promoting myeloid commitment, we performed gene expression profiling by RNA-seq of LT- and ST-HSC following S1PR3 OE. This yielded a subset of shared genes similarly upregulated following S1PR3 OE relative to controls, including the known myeloid differentiation and AML-associated factors Early Growth Response 1 and 2 (EGR1/2) and Tribbles 1 (TRIB1). Thus, promiscuous expression of S1PR3 promotes a myeloid fate program in human HSC. S1PR3 protein expression was higher in AML patient samples relative to human CB and bone marrow cells by flow cytometry. Bioinformatic analysis of three independent AML cohorts revealed that AML patient samples with high S1PR3 gene expression also had high EGR2 and TRIB1 expression. Limiting dilution xenotransplantation assays of LSC-containing fractions sorted based on surface expression of S1PR3 demonstrated lower LSC frequency in S1PR3high versus S1PR3low/- LSC fractions. Moreover, S1PR3 OE in LSC+ fractions virtually abolished leukemic engraftment in xenotranplantation assays. These results suggest that higher S1PR3 levels in LSC are associated with a more mature myeloid state and that further increasing S1PR3 levels disrupts LSC maintenance. Treatment of mice bearing primary AML xenografts with FTY720, a S1P mimetic that targets S1P receptors including S1PR3, decreased leukemia burden in a subset of patient samples tested, including those obtained from relapsed and treatment-refractory patients. 70% of AML samples tested showed decreased LSC frequency in serial repopulation assays following FTY720 treatment. Importantly, treatment with FTY720 did not alter normal hematopoietic xenografts, demonstrating the existence of a therapeutic window. Collectively, our results provide the first direct evidence that sphingolipids govern myeloid commitment in human HSC and LSC, and demonstrate the potential of S1PR3 as a novel therapeutic target in AML for eradication of LSC while sparing HSC. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicSphingolipid Metabolism and SignalingFrench-language works237,207