A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Golimumab Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: PURSUIT-Maintenance
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SC golimumab (GLM) maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active UC who responded to GLM induction. Methods: 1228 patients were enrolled from the PURSUIT-IV and PURSUIT-SC induction studies. The primary analysis population consisted of patients (n=464) who responded to GLM induction and were randomized to receive placebo (PBO), GLM 50 mg, or GLM 100 mg at baseline (wk0) and q4 wks through wk52. Primary endpoint was clinical response through wk54. Major secondary endpoints at both wks 30 and 54 were clinical remission, mucosal healing, and clinical remission among patients in clinical remission at wk0 of this study, and clinical remission with corticosteroid discontinuation at wk54 among patients receiving corticosteroids at wk0 of this study. Safety data is summarized for randomized patients; selected events of interest are summarized for all treated patients (including 464 randomized patients, 129 PBO induction responders who continued on PBO and 635 PBO or GLM induction non-responders who received GLM100 mg q4wks). Results: Among the 464 patients in clinical response to GLM induction who were randomized, 28% discontinued drug prior to the last dosing visit at wk52. Greater proportions of patients receiving GLM 50 mg (47%) or GLM 100 mg (51%) were in clinical response through wk54 vs PBO (31%; p=0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). Clinical remission at both wk 30 and wk 54 for PBO, GLM 50 mg, and GLM 100 mg was 15%, 24% (p=0.091), and 29% (p=0.003), mucosal healing at both wk 30 and wk 54 was 27%, 42%, and 44% (p=0.001). Numerically, more patients in both GLM groups (who were in remission at wk0) maintained clinical remission through wk54 vs PBO (24%, 37%, and 40% for PBO, GLM 50 mg, and GLM 100 mg). Corticosteroid free remission at wk54 was 18%, 28%, and 23% for PBO, GLM 50 mg, and GLM 100 mg; not statistically significant. Through wk54, the proportions of randomized patients with ≥1AE were 66%, 73%, and 73%, serious AEs were 8%, 8%, and 14%, for the PBO, GLM 50 mg, and GLM 100 mg groups (average wks of follow-up 33, 44 and 46); a similar profile was observed with all treated patients. Among all treated patients, there were 4 cases of active TB on GLM, and 3 deaths on GLM 100 mg due to: malnutrition and sepsis, disseminated TB, and cardiac failure. Malignancy rates were 0.4%, 0.0% and 0.3% (PBO, GLM 50 mg and GLM 100 mg). Conclusion: Among GLM induction responders, GLM 50 mg and GLM 100mg q4wks maintained clinical response through wk54; GLM 100 mg q4wks achieved long-term clinical remission and mucosal healing at both wk 30 and 54. The safety of GLM UC was similar to GLM experience in other labeled rheumatologic indications and with other anti-TNFs. Disclosure: William J Sandborn, Brian G. Feagan, Jean-Frederic Colombel, Walter Reinisch, Peter Gibson, Judith Collins, Gunnar Jarnerot, and Paul Rutgeerts - all investigators for Janssen R&D, LLC. Colleen Marano, Richard Strauss, Jewel Johanns, Hongyan Zhang, and Cynthia Guzzo - all employees of Janssen R&D.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».