MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Golimumab Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: PURSUIT-Maintenance

2012· article· en· W2978195289 on OpenAlexaff
William J. Sandborn, Brian Feagan, Colleen Marano, Richard Strauss, Jewel Johanns, Hongyan Zhang, Cynthia Guzzo, Jean–Frédéric Colombel, Walter Reinisch, Peter G. Gibson, J. Collins, Gunnar Järnerot, Paul Rutgeerts

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical Trials
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiscontinuationInternal medicineClinical endpointPlaceboUlcerative colitisPopulationRandomized controlled trialGolimumabMaintenance therapyClinical trialGastroenterologySurgeryChemotherapyEtanerceptRheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SC golimumab (GLM) maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active UC who responded to GLM induction. Methods: 1228 patients were enrolled from the PURSUIT-IV and PURSUIT-SC induction studies. The primary analysis population consisted of patients (n=464) who responded to GLM induction and were randomized to receive placebo (PBO), GLM 50 mg, or GLM 100 mg at baseline (wk0) and q4 wks through wk52. Primary endpoint was clinical response through wk54. Major secondary endpoints at both wks 30 and 54 were clinical remission, mucosal healing, and clinical remission among patients in clinical remission at wk0 of this study, and clinical remission with corticosteroid discontinuation at wk54 among patients receiving corticosteroids at wk0 of this study. Safety data is summarized for randomized patients; selected events of interest are summarized for all treated patients (including 464 randomized patients, 129 PBO induction responders who continued on PBO and 635 PBO or GLM induction non-responders who received GLM100 mg q4wks). Results: Among the 464 patients in clinical response to GLM induction who were randomized, 28% discontinued drug prior to the last dosing visit at wk52. Greater proportions of patients receiving GLM 50 mg (47%) or GLM 100 mg (51%) were in clinical response through wk54 vs PBO (31%; p=0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). Clinical remission at both wk 30 and wk 54 for PBO, GLM 50 mg, and GLM 100 mg was 15%, 24% (p=0.091), and 29% (p=0.003), mucosal healing at both wk 30 and wk 54 was 27%, 42%, and 44% (p=0.001). Numerically, more patients in both GLM groups (who were in remission at wk0) maintained clinical remission through wk54 vs PBO (24%, 37%, and 40% for PBO, GLM 50 mg, and GLM 100 mg). Corticosteroid free remission at wk54 was 18%, 28%, and 23% for PBO, GLM 50 mg, and GLM 100 mg; not statistically significant. Through wk54, the proportions of randomized patients with ≥1AE were 66%, 73%, and 73%, serious AEs were 8%, 8%, and 14%, for the PBO, GLM 50 mg, and GLM 100 mg groups (average wks of follow-up 33, 44 and 46); a similar profile was observed with all treated patients. Among all treated patients, there were 4 cases of active TB on GLM, and 3 deaths on GLM 100 mg due to: malnutrition and sepsis, disseminated TB, and cardiac failure. Malignancy rates were 0.4%, 0.0% and 0.3% (PBO, GLM 50 mg and GLM 100 mg). Conclusion: Among GLM induction responders, GLM 50 mg and GLM 100mg q4wks maintained clinical response through wk54; GLM 100 mg q4wks achieved long-term clinical remission and mucosal healing at both wk 30 and 54. The safety of GLM UC was similar to GLM experience in other labeled rheumatologic indications and with other anti-TNFs. Disclosure: William J Sandborn, Brian G. Feagan, Jean-Frederic Colombel, Walter Reinisch, Peter Gibson, Judith Collins, Gunnar Jarnerot, and Paul Rutgeerts - all investigators for Janssen R&D, LLC. Colleen Marano, Richard Strauss, Jewel Johanns, Hongyan Zhang, and Cynthia Guzzo - all employees of Janssen R&D.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→