MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2979451218 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.120.120

Cereblon Splicing of Exon 10 Mediates IMiDs Resistance in Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Validation in the CoMMpass Trial

2016· article· en· W2979451218 sur OpenAlexaff
Paola Neri, Ranjan Maity, Jonathan J. Keats, Inès Tagoug, Justin Simms, Daniel Auclair, Sagar Lonial, Nizar J. Bahlis

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Établissements canadiensInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCereblonExonPomalidomideUbiquitin ligaseAlternative splicingMolecular biologyHEK 293 cellsRNA splicingBiologyLenalidomideChemistryCell biologyCell cultureGeneticsUbiquitinMultiple myelomaGeneImmunologyRNA

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: IMiDs neomorphe the substrates binding of CRL4_DDB1_ROC1 E3 ligase through their interaction with the adaptor protein Cereblon (CRBN) triggering the proteasomal degradation of IKZF1/IKZF3. This binding results from hydrogen bonds forming between the carbonyl residues of the IMiDs' glutarimide moiety and several amino acids within a hydrophobic pocket on the surface of CRBN. This pocket is formed by three tryptophan residues (W380, W386 and W400) mapping to CRBN c-terminus exons 10-11. Others and us, have previously shown that in vitro silencing or knock-out of CRBN is clearly associated with resistance to IMiDs, however CRBN mutations mapping to its thalidomide binding domain are rarely seen. We have previously identified through paired sequencing of the transcriptome of primary myeloma cells (pre- and post IMiDs) the expression of a CRBN mRNA splice variant (CRBN-005 or ENST00000424814) lacking exon 10. We also demonstrated that this isoform is translated into a stable protein that retains its binding to DDB1/Cul4a ligase but was no longer capable of interacting with IMiDs. Functionally, in HEK293 we have also shown that stable expression of CRBN-005 at higher levels relative to the full-length variant (CRBN-004 or ENST00000231948) abrogated IMiDs-induced degradation of Ikaros. In the current work, we validated in myeloma cell lines in vitro that the splicing of CRBN exon 10 was sufficient to reverse the cytotoxicity of lenalidomide. We also interrogated the longitudinal CoMMpass trial for the expression of CRBN-005 transcripts and its impact on survival. Methods and Results: We initially confirmed that lentiviral CRISPR mediated stable knock-out of CRBN using gRNA targeting exon 2 in the MM1S and OPM2 lenalidomide sensitive cell lines, resulted in complete resistance to IMiDs. In order to examine the role of CRBN exon 10 splicing in IMiDs resistance, we next cloned spliced CRBN-005 isoform (Δ10-CRBN) or full length CRBN (WT-CRBN) into lentiviral plasmid pLX304 and stably transduced JJN3 and KMS28BM myeloma cells. The Δ10-CRBN plasmid expressed a ~ 45 kDa proteins detectable by western blotting with CRBN65 antibody (Celgene, binds aa 65-76). Stable expression of Δ10-CRBN in JJN3 and KMS28BM cells significantly reduced Aiolos and Ikaros degradation in response to lenalidomide treatment and partially reversed (~ 30%) KMS28BM cell death (JJN3 are resistant to lenalidomide despite IKZF1 degradation). Consistent with our previous studies in HEK293 cells, high expression of Δ10-CRBN relative to endogenous WT-CRBN was required for the reversal of lenalidomide effects. Furthermore, we used the CRIPSR technology to induce splicing of endogenous CRBN exon 10 using two lentiviral gRNAs targeting intron9-exon10 (TTTATCCTTATGTGGGCCGA) and exon10-intron10 junctions (CAGAACACAGCTGGTTTCCT) in lenalidomide-sensitive MM1S and OPM2 cells stably engineered to express Cas9. Single cell clones expressing the exon 10 spliced CRBN were identified by cDNA cloning and sanger sequencing. The viability of the clones in response to lenalidomide as well as Ikaors degradation were nearly fully reversed in comparison to Cas9 only expressing MM1S and OPM2 cells. Lastly, in order to clinically validate the role of Δ10-CRBN in IMiDs resistance we interrogated the transcriptome of patients enrolled in the CoMMpass trial where in addition to genomic profiling (shallow genome long-insert sequencing, WES, RNAseq) clinical data and outcomes are captured. In the CoMMpass IA8, clinical and molecular data is available on 549 subjects, of which 486 were identified as ever receiving IMiDs-based regimen. We analyzed the survival of these patients based on the ratio of transcript levels (TPM) of spliced CRBN (ENST00000424814) to that of full-length CRBN. Using a cut-off ratio of 0.75, the survival of patients treated with IMiDs based regimen and high levels of spliced CRBN was significantly worse (Figure). Importantly, in 20 patients were RNA was available pre- and post IMiDs, we show that the levels of the CRBN spliced variants were significantly increased at the time of disease progression (Figure boxplot). Conclusions: In the current work, we have confirmed the role CRBN exon 10 splicing in IMiDs resistance using functional in vitro validation studies and demonstrated its predictive effects on IMiDs activity in the CoMMpass clinical dataset. Figure Figure. Disclosures Neri: Celgene and Jannsen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lonial:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Bahlis:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,083
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,182

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations13
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetProtein Degradation and InhibitorsTravaux en français237 207