MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2980025644 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.295.295

Large-Scale High Resolution Integration of Copy Number and Gene Expression in DLBCL Reveals Focal and Frequent Deletions in Chromatin Modifying Genes with Outcome Correlation

2012· article· en· W2980025644 sur OpenAlexaff
Fong Chun Chan, Susana Ben‐Neriah, Raymond S. Lim, Sandy Hu, Sanja Rogić, Nathalie A. Johnson, Ryan D. Morin, Gavin Ha, Jiraui Ding, David W. Scott, Laurie H. Sehn, Joseph M. Connors, Marco A. Marra, Randy D. Gascoyne, Sohrab P. Shah, Christian Steidl

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaJewish General HospitalBC Cancer Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaOncologySNP arrayPopulationLymphomaBiologyVincristineCHOPCDKN2AInternal medicineCancer researchCancerMedicineCyclophosphamideImmunologyGeneticsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 295 Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), accounting for approximately 30–40% of all new lymphoma cases. While standard therapy using rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) has significantly increased the survival of DLBCL patients, approximately one third of DLBCL patients still remain unresponsive to or relapse after standard treatment. Further investigation into the genomic architecture of DLBCL will contribute to elucidating the causes of the poor outcomes in this subgroup of patients. While the copy number and the gene expression profiles of DLBCL specimens have been well described as separate analyses, a large-scale high resolution integration of both orthologous measurements has yet to be reported. The integration of these two data types in a clinically well-annotated cohort of DLBCL is crucial as it can potentially distinguish driver from passenger genomic aberrations and reveal associations with clinical outcome. Methods and Patients: Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarrays were used to ascertain the copy number profiles in 151 pretreatment biopsies of DLBCL that were representative of the population of DLBCL patients treated at the British Columbia Cancer Agency. Clinical outcome data were available for all 151 patients with 142 patients receiving R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like treatment. Matching RNA-seq libraries were used to quantitate the gene expression levels in 91 samples. The SNP 6.0 pre-processing method cRMAv2 was used to generate raw probe intensities that were then normalized to 1258 HapMap3 SNP 6.0 arrays. Copy number state calls were predicted using HMM-Dosage. RNA-seq data were aligned using the split-read aware aligner GSNAP and gene expression values were generated using the metric reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads. DriverNet analyses were utilized to predict functionally relevant driver genes and outcome correlations in R-CHOP treated patients were performed using Cox regression and the log-rank test. Results: The copy number landscape derived from the SNP 6.0 microarrays revealed previously reported large scale chromosomal deletions in chromosome 6p and amplifications in chromosomes 3, 7 and 18. By integrating the gene expression with copy number data, we found that gene copy number was correlated with its own gene expression (classified as being cis-correlated) in 23.5% of genes. In addition, we investigated copy number aberrations which were highly correlated with gene expression across the genome (classified as trans-correlated). This analysis revealed aberration hotspots in genomic locations 3q26-q28 (TBL1XR1, BCL6, TP63), 17p12 (NCOR1, MAP2K4), 18q11.1-q11.2 (RBBP8) and 22q11.21 (BID, IL17RA) suggesting that these hotspots regulate important pathways that may contribute to the pathogenesis of DLBCL. We identified previously reported focal amplifications (e.g. REL) and deletions (e.g. B2M, CDKN2A). Moreover, we identified novel focal deletions, including homozygous deletions, in chromatin modifying genes: LCOR (7.9%), RCOR1 (9.9%), and NCOR1 (17.9%), all of which were cis-correlated and were validated using fluorescence in situ hybridization. DriverNet analyses identified RCOR1 deletions as one of the main driver alterations. RCOR1 deletions were also found to be associated with progression-free survival (5-year progression-free survival: deleted 40% vs. non-deleted 75%, p=0.0188). Discussion: Our systematic integration of SNP 6.0 and RNA-seq data confirmed findings of previous studies and also revealed novel genomic aberration hotspots and highly focal and frequent deletions in chromatin modifying genes. Results derived from our large-scale high resolution data set indicate the feasibility and efficacy of integrative genomic analyses in revealing novel and pathogenetically relevant genomic aberrations in lymphoid cancers. The discovery of the association of RCOR1 deletions with progression-free survival suggests that RCOR1 deletions could be used as a prognostic marker and might indicate a molecular phenotype that can be targeted by novel therapeutic agents in DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→