MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2980025644 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.295.295

Large-Scale High Resolution Integration of Copy Number and Gene Expression in DLBCL Reveals Focal and Frequent Deletions in Chromatin Modifying Genes with Outcome Correlation

2012· article· en· W2980025644 on OpenAlexaff
Fong Chun Chan, Susana Ben‐Neriah, Raymond S. Lim, Sandy Hu, Sanja Rogić, Nathalie A. Johnson, Ryan D. Morin, Gavin Ha, Jiraui Ding, David W. Scott, Laurie H. Sehn, Joseph M. Connors, Marco A. Marra, Randy D. Gascoyne, Sohrab P. Shah, Christian Steidl

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaJewish General HospitalBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaOncologySNP arrayPopulationLymphomaBiologyVincristineCHOPCDKN2AInternal medicineCancer researchCancerMedicineCyclophosphamideImmunologyGeneticsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 295 Introduction: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), accounting for approximately 30–40% of all new lymphoma cases. While standard therapy using rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) has significantly increased the survival of DLBCL patients, approximately one third of DLBCL patients still remain unresponsive to or relapse after standard treatment. Further investigation into the genomic architecture of DLBCL will contribute to elucidating the causes of the poor outcomes in this subgroup of patients. While the copy number and the gene expression profiles of DLBCL specimens have been well described as separate analyses, a large-scale high resolution integration of both orthologous measurements has yet to be reported. The integration of these two data types in a clinically well-annotated cohort of DLBCL is crucial as it can potentially distinguish driver from passenger genomic aberrations and reveal associations with clinical outcome. Methods and Patients: Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarrays were used to ascertain the copy number profiles in 151 pretreatment biopsies of DLBCL that were representative of the population of DLBCL patients treated at the British Columbia Cancer Agency. Clinical outcome data were available for all 151 patients with 142 patients receiving R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like treatment. Matching RNA-seq libraries were used to quantitate the gene expression levels in 91 samples. The SNP 6.0 pre-processing method cRMAv2 was used to generate raw probe intensities that were then normalized to 1258 HapMap3 SNP 6.0 arrays. Copy number state calls were predicted using HMM-Dosage. RNA-seq data were aligned using the split-read aware aligner GSNAP and gene expression values were generated using the metric reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads. DriverNet analyses were utilized to predict functionally relevant driver genes and outcome correlations in R-CHOP treated patients were performed using Cox regression and the log-rank test. Results: The copy number landscape derived from the SNP 6.0 microarrays revealed previously reported large scale chromosomal deletions in chromosome 6p and amplifications in chromosomes 3, 7 and 18. By integrating the gene expression with copy number data, we found that gene copy number was correlated with its own gene expression (classified as being cis-correlated) in 23.5% of genes. In addition, we investigated copy number aberrations which were highly correlated with gene expression across the genome (classified as trans-correlated). This analysis revealed aberration hotspots in genomic locations 3q26-q28 (TBL1XR1, BCL6, TP63), 17p12 (NCOR1, MAP2K4), 18q11.1-q11.2 (RBBP8) and 22q11.21 (BID, IL17RA) suggesting that these hotspots regulate important pathways that may contribute to the pathogenesis of DLBCL. We identified previously reported focal amplifications (e.g. REL) and deletions (e.g. B2M, CDKN2A). Moreover, we identified novel focal deletions, including homozygous deletions, in chromatin modifying genes: LCOR (7.9%), RCOR1 (9.9%), and NCOR1 (17.9%), all of which were cis-correlated and were validated using fluorescence in situ hybridization. DriverNet analyses identified RCOR1 deletions as one of the main driver alterations. RCOR1 deletions were also found to be associated with progression-free survival (5-year progression-free survival: deleted 40% vs. non-deleted 75%, p=0.0188). Discussion: Our systematic integration of SNP 6.0 and RNA-seq data confirmed findings of previous studies and also revealed novel genomic aberration hotspots and highly focal and frequent deletions in chromatin modifying genes. Results derived from our large-scale high resolution data set indicate the feasibility and efficacy of integrative genomic analyses in revealing novel and pathogenetically relevant genomic aberrations in lymphoid cancers. The discovery of the association of RCOR1 deletions with progression-free survival suggests that RCOR1 deletions could be used as a prognostic marker and might indicate a molecular phenotype that can be targeted by novel therapeutic agents in DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→