MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2983139950 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-123817

Sporadic Late Onset Nemaline Myopathy with a Monoclonal Gammopathy: Comparative Effectiveness of Immuno- and Chemotherapy

2019· article· en· W2983139950 sur OpenAlexaff
David Susman, Jesse McLean, Rouslan Kotchetkov

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueBiochemical and Molecular Research
Établissements canadiensRoyal Victoria Regional Health CentreWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNemaline myopathyMedicineMonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceInternal medicinePlasmapheresisChemotherapyRituximabAutologous stem-cell transplantationGammopathyGastroenterologyOncologyMonoclonalMyopathyLymphomaImmunologyMonoclonal antibodyAntibody

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction A rare subset of sporadic late-onset nemaline myopathy (SLONM) is associated with monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS). The role of monoclonal protein (M-protein) in SLONM is unknown, but SLONM with MGUS (SLONM+MGUS) demonstrates an aggressive disease course with severe muscular weakness, early development of respiratory failure, and is often fatal. Whether SLONM+MGUS represents a malignant or dysimmune disease remains unclear. Currently, two approaches are used to treat SLONM+MGUS: 1) immunosuppression ± plasmapheresis/exchange; or 2) chemotherapy (ChT) ± autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Unfortunately, due to the rare occurrence of the disease, the best treatment modality is unknown. Methods We conducted a literature search to identify previous treatment modalities for patients diagnosed with SLONM+MGUS using PubMed, Elsevier, Medline, and CINAHL databases from 1975 to 2019. All publications were carefully reviewed to remove "duplicate" patients. Overall, 28 reports were included for the final analysis. Results We identified 38 unique patients diagnosed with SLONM+MGUS treated either with immunotherapy (IT) (n=19) or ChT ± ASCT (n=19). The median age was 49 years [range: 26-75] in the IT group and 47 years [range: 24-64] in the ChT group. There was a slight male preponderance in the IT group [n=14 (74%)] than in the ChT group [n=10 (53%)]. Similarly, more cases with kappa light chain restricted M-protein were observed in the IT group [n=12 (67%)] than in the ChT group [n=8 (42%)]. In the IT group, M-protein values were only reported in two patients (mean: 0.42 g/L), while M-protein values were reported for 14 patients in the ChT group (mean: 6.54 g/L). In the IT group 16 patients (84%) received steroids, 5 (26%) plasmapheresis, 10 (53%) steroid-sparing immunosuppressants (low dose cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, cytarabine, and mycophenolate mofetil), 2 (11%) rituximab, and 10 (53%) IVIG. Twelve (63%) patients received oral prednisone (mean dose: 67 mg) and 3 (16%) received pulse methylprednisolone (1 g). Patients received IT modalities sequentially or in parallel. Six patients (32%) received 1 and 13 patients (68%) received 2 or 3 (median = 2) IT types. Neurological improvement was observed in 10 patients, a 53% overall response rate (ORR) with 3 (16%) patients in complete remission (CR), and 7 (37%) patients in partial response (PR). No improvement or progression was observed in 9 (47%) patients (Figure 1). In 2 patients, neurological CR was associated with complete disappearance of M-protein. Mean time to best response was 19 months in a follow-up duration of 23 months. The ChT group included three categories: 1) 10 (53%) patients received ASCT with high dose melphalan (mean: 164 mg/m2); 2) 3 patients (16%) were treated with Cyclophosphamide/Bortezomib/Dexamethasone (CyBorD), cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Ld) chemotherapy without ASCT; and 3) 6 (31%) patients underwent induction chemotherapy with CyBorD (n=2) and Ld (n=4), followed by consolidative ASCT. Neurological improvement was achieved in 18 patients, a 94.7% ORR with CR in 14 (73.7%) and PR in 3 (21.0%) patients. Only one patient did not respond to therapy. The best neurological improvement correlated with disappearance of M-protein [complete hematological remission (CHR)]. Mean time to best response was 10 months, which was shorter than the IT group. Follow-up duration was 31 months. Conclusion Based on a comprehensive evaluation of existing treatment modalities for patients with SLOMN+MGUS we conclude that the best course of treatment is through consideration of the disease as a malignancy rather than a dysimmune disease. Our review supports that the best method of treatment entails ChT with or without of consolidative ASCT in the pursuit of eliminating the malignant plasma cell clone. In conjunction with nemaline myopathy presence of M-protein has clinical significance and it may be worth considering reclassifying SLONM+MGUS as SLONM with Monoclonal Gammopathy of Clinical (Neurological) Significance (SLONM+MGCS). Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,446

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetBiochemical and Molecular ResearchTravaux en français237 207