MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2983139950 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-123817

Sporadic Late Onset Nemaline Myopathy with a Monoclonal Gammopathy: Comparative Effectiveness of Immuno- and Chemotherapy

2019· article· en· W2983139950 on OpenAlexaff
David Susman, Jesse McLean, Rouslan Kotchetkov

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Molecular Research
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria Regional Health CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNemaline myopathyMedicineMonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceInternal medicinePlasmapheresisChemotherapyRituximabAutologous stem-cell transplantationGammopathyGastroenterologyOncologyMonoclonalMyopathyLymphomaImmunologyMonoclonal antibodyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction A rare subset of sporadic late-onset nemaline myopathy (SLONM) is associated with monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS). The role of monoclonal protein (M-protein) in SLONM is unknown, but SLONM with MGUS (SLONM+MGUS) demonstrates an aggressive disease course with severe muscular weakness, early development of respiratory failure, and is often fatal. Whether SLONM+MGUS represents a malignant or dysimmune disease remains unclear. Currently, two approaches are used to treat SLONM+MGUS: 1) immunosuppression ± plasmapheresis/exchange; or 2) chemotherapy (ChT) ± autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Unfortunately, due to the rare occurrence of the disease, the best treatment modality is unknown. Methods We conducted a literature search to identify previous treatment modalities for patients diagnosed with SLONM+MGUS using PubMed, Elsevier, Medline, and CINAHL databases from 1975 to 2019. All publications were carefully reviewed to remove "duplicate" patients. Overall, 28 reports were included for the final analysis. Results We identified 38 unique patients diagnosed with SLONM+MGUS treated either with immunotherapy (IT) (n=19) or ChT ± ASCT (n=19). The median age was 49 years [range: 26-75] in the IT group and 47 years [range: 24-64] in the ChT group. There was a slight male preponderance in the IT group [n=14 (74%)] than in the ChT group [n=10 (53%)]. Similarly, more cases with kappa light chain restricted M-protein were observed in the IT group [n=12 (67%)] than in the ChT group [n=8 (42%)]. In the IT group, M-protein values were only reported in two patients (mean: 0.42 g/L), while M-protein values were reported for 14 patients in the ChT group (mean: 6.54 g/L). In the IT group 16 patients (84%) received steroids, 5 (26%) plasmapheresis, 10 (53%) steroid-sparing immunosuppressants (low dose cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, cytarabine, and mycophenolate mofetil), 2 (11%) rituximab, and 10 (53%) IVIG. Twelve (63%) patients received oral prednisone (mean dose: 67 mg) and 3 (16%) received pulse methylprednisolone (1 g). Patients received IT modalities sequentially or in parallel. Six patients (32%) received 1 and 13 patients (68%) received 2 or 3 (median = 2) IT types. Neurological improvement was observed in 10 patients, a 53% overall response rate (ORR) with 3 (16%) patients in complete remission (CR), and 7 (37%) patients in partial response (PR). No improvement or progression was observed in 9 (47%) patients (Figure 1). In 2 patients, neurological CR was associated with complete disappearance of M-protein. Mean time to best response was 19 months in a follow-up duration of 23 months. The ChT group included three categories: 1) 10 (53%) patients received ASCT with high dose melphalan (mean: 164 mg/m2); 2) 3 patients (16%) were treated with Cyclophosphamide/Bortezomib/Dexamethasone (CyBorD), cyclophosphamide/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Ld) chemotherapy without ASCT; and 3) 6 (31%) patients underwent induction chemotherapy with CyBorD (n=2) and Ld (n=4), followed by consolidative ASCT. Neurological improvement was achieved in 18 patients, a 94.7% ORR with CR in 14 (73.7%) and PR in 3 (21.0%) patients. Only one patient did not respond to therapy. The best neurological improvement correlated with disappearance of M-protein [complete hematological remission (CHR)]. Mean time to best response was 10 months, which was shorter than the IT group. Follow-up duration was 31 months. Conclusion Based on a comprehensive evaluation of existing treatment modalities for patients with SLOMN+MGUS we conclude that the best course of treatment is through consideration of the disease as a malignancy rather than a dysimmune disease. Our review supports that the best method of treatment entails ChT with or without of consolidative ASCT in the pursuit of eliminating the malignant plasma cell clone. In conjunction with nemaline myopathy presence of M-protein has clinical significance and it may be worth considering reclassifying SLONM+MGUS as SLONM with Monoclonal Gammopathy of Clinical (Neurological) Significance (SLONM+MGCS). Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicBiochemical and Molecular ResearchFrench-language works237,207