MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W300523114

The Long and Short Annuities: Strong Sales Performance through the First Quarter Generated Welcome Fee Income. Will That Pace Continue? What Impact Will New FINRA Regs Have?

2011· article· en· W300523114 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael D. White

Notice bibliographique

RevueABA banking journal · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnnuityLife annuityQuarter (Canadian coin)RevenueFinancial servicesActuarial scienceNet incomeBusinessEarningsFinanceEconomicsPension
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Annuity fee income jumped sharply in the first quarter--welcome news to an industry with an operating revenue problem. With no significant change in banks' net interest income expected soon, and service charges on deposit accounts pinched, the sale of annuities can give a boost to earnings. Annuities are subject to market forces, of course, but have solid long-term potential. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] A significant turnaround Annuity fee income took off in second half 2010. Then, in first-quarter 2011, annuity commissions registered their high-water mark, reaching a record $748.2 million, up 28.4% from first quarter 2010, according to the Michael White-ABIA Bank Annuity Fee Income Report, compiled by Michael White Associates and sponsored by the American Bankers Insurance Association. To get there, 40.1% of reporting bank holding companies participated in annuity sales; also, 12% of banks contributed $204.2 million, or 27.2% of the total. Among the top 50 BHCs in annuity concentration (i.e., annuity fee income as a percent of noninterest income), the median ratio was 7.3% in first quarter 2011. Among the top 50 small banks, the median was 16.6%. Overcoming broker bias These results were achieved despite the fact that some Series 7 securities brokers dislike annuities. They typically believe annuity guarantees are too expensive and that mutual funds, laddered bonds, and other securities are better buys. Community banks (those under $4 billion in assets) tend to orientate more toward financial planning and sales of packaged products like annuities. These different attitudes and approaches to delivering financial services are reflected in the fact that, in first quarter 2011, annuities represented 13.1% of investment program income among big banks, versus 25% at community banks. An important factor in successfully distributing annuities among big-bank brokers has been a resurgence in the deployment of field wholesalers. These wholesalers, usually employed by insurers, are critical in delivering to financial advisors needed product training; sales ideas; and professional sales, marketing, and service support. Community banks receive similar assistance through their use of third-party marketers. Near-term environment Fixed annuities thrive when decent rate spreads exist between 5-year certificates of deposits and the average effective yield of fixed annuities guaranteed for 5 years. Historically, those spreads were about 150 basis points, but in recent months they have been compressed to low double-digit figures leading to a decline in fixed annuity sales. Current low spreads will likely continue, as interest rates remain depressed. Many people don't want to get locked in to low rates only to see rates rise, but they remain wary of variable annuities. Concerns about low interest rates and inflation, however, could give impetus to sales of certain indexed annuities, which have come to life now that the Dodd-Frank Act has declared that they are not investments. Earlier this year, variable annuity sales experienced a recovery attributed to the improved performance of U.S. equities. That helped offset a decline in fixed annuity sales. However, the steep declines and volatility in the stock market in July and August have harmed investor confidence, so variable sales could slow as well. Still, variable annuity sales could be stimulated, considering that Morningstar reported in mid-August that second-quarter development of guaranteed benefits for variable annuities tripled over those of first quarter, and that average living benefit expenses continued to fall. Long-term environment If annuity sales do slow, it will not be for long, because the long-term environment is favorable. Baby-boomer demographics underscore a huge need for annuities, especially given the faded economic prospects of recent years, steep declines in consumers' personal and pension assets, and retreat to guarantees and safety. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,051
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0030,010
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueABA banking journalMême sujetFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisTravaux en français237 207