A200 HUMANIZED CELIAC-PRONE EPITHELIUM IN VITRO EXPRESS MHC-II AND CO-STIMULATORY MOLECULES NECESSARY FOR GLUTEN PEPTIDE PRESENTATION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background The role intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) play in the breakdown of tolerance to gluten at an early stage in celiac disease (CeD) is unclear. Epithelial stress is a feature of CeD, and although the triggers are largely unknown, it is accompanied by expression of several markers that could be involved in initiation of inflammatory responses. IECs have been shown to express MHC class II (MHC-II) molecules and participate in antigen presentation in several models. Whether IECs can participate in gluten peptide presentation, the major environmental trigger in celiac disease, is unknown. To study this, a model expressing human MHC-II, HLA DQ8 or HLA-DQ2, would be required. Aims To develop organoid monolayers from transgenic mice expressing human celiac risk genes: HLA-DQ8 and -DQ2. To investigate conditions leading to the induction of epithelial MHC-II and its main co-stimulatory molecules, CD80, CD86 and CD40, that could enable early gluten peptide presentation. Methods In order to show pathophysiological significance of the model, we used two approaches, either induction of inflammation in vivo through gluten sensitization, or direct stimulation of the monolayers using pro-inflammatory cytokines relevant in CeD, such as IFNγ. Mice were sensitized with Pepsin-Trypsin digested gliadin and cholera toxin (CT) once a week for 3 weeks, followed by a challenge phase in which they only received gliadin. Control mice received CT only. We then developed organoid monolayers from the duodenum followed by stimulation with 10 ng/ml IFNγ. Finally, markers necessary for gluten peptide presentation, the expression of MHC-II and its co-stimulatory molecules, were evaluated using flow cytometry. Results Both in vivo gluten sensitization and in vitro stimulation of the organoid derived monolayer with IFNγ induced a proinflammatory response, that independently primed the epithelium to express MHC-II molecules (p =0.02 and <0.0001, respectively). When in vivo sensitization and in vitro IFNγ stimulation were combined, epithelial MHC-II expression was further upregulated (p <0.0001). Lastly, only the combination of gluten sensitization and in vitro IFNγ induced expression of MHC-II co-stimulatory molecules, which are necessary for antigen presentation. Conclusions Our findings support that gluten induced-inflammation in vivo as well as independent stimuli that release IFNγ enhance the capacity of the IECs to express MHC-II molecules. However, co-stimulatory molecules are only expressed by the epithelium when both gluten tolerance is broken by in vivo sensitization and the organoid monolayers is further exposed to IFNγ. The results support the hypothesis that the epithelium participates in gluten peptide presentation and that this pathway is stimulated by both gluten-dependent and independent inflammation. Funding Agencies CIHRSupported by CIHR and a Farncombe Family Grant to EFV and TFD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».