A200 HUMANIZED CELIAC-PRONE EPITHELIUM IN VITRO EXPRESS MHC-II AND CO-STIMULATORY MOLECULES NECESSARY FOR GLUTEN PEPTIDE PRESENTATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The role intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) play in the breakdown of tolerance to gluten at an early stage in celiac disease (CeD) is unclear. Epithelial stress is a feature of CeD, and although the triggers are largely unknown, it is accompanied by expression of several markers that could be involved in initiation of inflammatory responses. IECs have been shown to express MHC class II (MHC-II) molecules and participate in antigen presentation in several models. Whether IECs can participate in gluten peptide presentation, the major environmental trigger in celiac disease, is unknown. To study this, a model expressing human MHC-II, HLA DQ8 or HLA-DQ2, would be required. Aims To develop organoid monolayers from transgenic mice expressing human celiac risk genes: HLA-DQ8 and -DQ2. To investigate conditions leading to the induction of epithelial MHC-II and its main co-stimulatory molecules, CD80, CD86 and CD40, that could enable early gluten peptide presentation. Methods In order to show pathophysiological significance of the model, we used two approaches, either induction of inflammation in vivo through gluten sensitization, or direct stimulation of the monolayers using pro-inflammatory cytokines relevant in CeD, such as IFNγ. Mice were sensitized with Pepsin-Trypsin digested gliadin and cholera toxin (CT) once a week for 3 weeks, followed by a challenge phase in which they only received gliadin. Control mice received CT only. We then developed organoid monolayers from the duodenum followed by stimulation with 10 ng/ml IFNγ. Finally, markers necessary for gluten peptide presentation, the expression of MHC-II and its co-stimulatory molecules, were evaluated using flow cytometry. Results Both in vivo gluten sensitization and in vitro stimulation of the organoid derived monolayer with IFNγ induced a proinflammatory response, that independently primed the epithelium to express MHC-II molecules (p =0.02 and <0.0001, respectively). When in vivo sensitization and in vitro IFNγ stimulation were combined, epithelial MHC-II expression was further upregulated (p <0.0001). Lastly, only the combination of gluten sensitization and in vitro IFNγ induced expression of MHC-II co-stimulatory molecules, which are necessary for antigen presentation. Conclusions Our findings support that gluten induced-inflammation in vivo as well as independent stimuli that release IFNγ enhance the capacity of the IECs to express MHC-II molecules. However, co-stimulatory molecules are only expressed by the epithelium when both gluten tolerance is broken by in vivo sensitization and the organoid monolayers is further exposed to IFNγ. The results support the hypothesis that the epithelium participates in gluten peptide presentation and that this pathway is stimulated by both gluten-dependent and independent inflammation. Funding Agencies CIHRSupported by CIHR and a Farncombe Family Grant to EFV and TFD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".