MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W307013752

Min as Translator of Crabbe: A Russian Transformation of Peter Grimes (1)

2005· article· en· W307013752 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
W. K. Thomas, Kenneth H. Ober

Notice bibliographique

RevueGermano-Slavica · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTranslation Studies and Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoetryGeorge (robot)HERONarrativeLiteratureOrder (exchange)HistoryLyricsHymnArtArt history
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

When George Crabbe's poem The Borough appeared in 1810, it proved immediately popular. A collection of twenty-four verse Letters, it was reprinted that year and five times in following five years; since then it has reappeared several times in conjunction with other poems of Crabbe. One of its narrative Letters in particular, has proved especially popular and has often been anthologized. In fact, in 1945 Benjamin Britten (with Montague Slater as librettist) wrote an opera about its hero, and in 1971 Michael Marland wrote further dramatic version of poem. (2) Crabbe's story is about man, Peter Grimes, who lived in Suffolk coastal town. As boy he rebelled violently against his pious father, and as youth, in order to pay for his cards and ale, he fish'd by water and he filch'd by land. (3) As grown man, seeking to exercise complete control over human soul, he secured three apprentice boys in succession and abused them horribly, until he became responsible for each boy's death. At length town ostracized him, and, compelled to live alone by bounding marsh-bank and blighted tree (174), he gradually went mad. In his madness he ran, terror-stricken, till seized and taken to parish poorhouse. There, a lost, lone man, so harass'd and undone (256), with sympathetic women crowding about his death-bed, he described visions he had had of his father and two of boys who came to him repeatedly and tried to lure him to his death. Finally he paused in his story, then cried, / 'Again they come,' and mutter'd as he died (374-5). The most striking aspect of story is that while exposing Peter's cruelty unflinchingly Crabbe somehow manages by end of poem to arouse surprising amount of charity for him. There is indeed something fascinating about Grimes and about man it describes. It is not surprising, therefore, that poem has been repeatedly reprinted, or that it has been adapted in various forms. What may be surprising, however, is that Grimes made an appearance in nineteenth-century tsarist Russia, through efforts of three leading Russian men of letters. Aleksandr Vasil'evic Druzinin (1824-64), prominent writer, critic, and specialist in English literature, introduced George Crabbe (1754-1832) to Russia in 1850s with his critical biography of English poet. Crabbe's work, which Druzinin said was not known either in Russia, Germany, or France, exactly illustrated (he believed) his own critical theory that art should not be subjected to needs of society, but should instead describe reality. (4) Crabbe was first toiler in field of moving his native literature closer to depiction of actual life (pervyj truzenik na poprisce sblizenija svoej rodnoj slovesnosti s izobrazeniem dejstvitel'noj zizni). Nor was Crabbe's importance confined to English literature: he was instead the most natural writer of our century (o samom natural'nom pisatele nasego stoletija). (5) To support this judgement and various analyses he made of Crabbe's works, Druzinin supplied translations of several excerpts. His labours must have stimulated interest in Crabbe, for two other noted translators soon began publishing Russian versions of English poet. Nikolaj Vasil'evic Gerbel' (1827-83) translated portions from poems earlier than The Borough, (6) as did Dmitrij Egorovic Min (1818-85), who then proceeded to publish translation of whole of Grimes in 1862. (7) A few years later Gerbel' reprinted Piter Grajms along with other of Min's translations (and his own) in his anthology of English poets, Anglijskie poety v biografijax i obrazcax. It was particularly appropriate that Min should translate Grimes. (8) He published much original poetry in leading literary journals and proved so acceptable translator that, after translating Crabbe (and Schiller's Das Lied von der Glocke in 1856), he proceeded to publish translations of Byron's Siege of Corinth (1873, 1875), part of Byron's Don Juan (1881), Shakespeare's King John (1882), and Dante's Inferno (1885). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,037

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,004
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0000,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGermano-SlavicaMême sujetTranslation Studies and PracticesTravaux en français237 207