MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W307013752

Min as Translator of Crabbe: A Russian Transformation of Peter Grimes (1)

2005· article· en· W307013752 on OpenAlex
W. K. Thomas, Kenneth H. Ober

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGermano-Slavica · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryGeorge (robot)HERONarrativeLiteratureOrder (exchange)HistoryLyricsHymnArtArt history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When George Crabbe's poem The Borough appeared in 1810, it proved immediately popular. A collection of twenty-four verse Letters, it was reprinted that year and five times in following five years; since then it has reappeared several times in conjunction with other poems of Crabbe. One of its narrative Letters in particular, has proved especially popular and has often been anthologized. In fact, in 1945 Benjamin Britten (with Montague Slater as librettist) wrote an opera about its hero, and in 1971 Michael Marland wrote further dramatic version of poem. (2) Crabbe's story is about man, Peter Grimes, who lived in Suffolk coastal town. As boy he rebelled violently against his pious father, and as youth, in order to pay for his cards and ale, he fish'd by water and he filch'd by land. (3) As grown man, seeking to exercise complete control over human soul, he secured three apprentice boys in succession and abused them horribly, until he became responsible for each boy's death. At length town ostracized him, and, compelled to live alone by bounding marsh-bank and blighted tree (174), he gradually went mad. In his madness he ran, terror-stricken, till seized and taken to parish poorhouse. There, a lost, lone man, so harass'd and undone (256), with sympathetic women crowding about his death-bed, he described visions he had had of his father and two of boys who came to him repeatedly and tried to lure him to his death. Finally he paused in his story, then cried, / 'Again they come,' and mutter'd as he died (374-5). The most striking aspect of story is that while exposing Peter's cruelty unflinchingly Crabbe somehow manages by end of poem to arouse surprising amount of charity for him. There is indeed something fascinating about Grimes and about man it describes. It is not surprising, therefore, that poem has been repeatedly reprinted, or that it has been adapted in various forms. What may be surprising, however, is that Grimes made an appearance in nineteenth-century tsarist Russia, through efforts of three leading Russian men of letters. Aleksandr Vasil'evic Druzinin (1824-64), prominent writer, critic, and specialist in English literature, introduced George Crabbe (1754-1832) to Russia in 1850s with his critical biography of English poet. Crabbe's work, which Druzinin said was not known either in Russia, Germany, or France, exactly illustrated (he believed) his own critical theory that art should not be subjected to needs of society, but should instead describe reality. (4) Crabbe was first toiler in field of moving his native literature closer to depiction of actual life (pervyj truzenik na poprisce sblizenija svoej rodnoj slovesnosti s izobrazeniem dejstvitel'noj zizni). Nor was Crabbe's importance confined to English literature: he was instead the most natural writer of our century (o samom natural'nom pisatele nasego stoletija). (5) To support this judgement and various analyses he made of Crabbe's works, Druzinin supplied translations of several excerpts. His labours must have stimulated interest in Crabbe, for two other noted translators soon began publishing Russian versions of English poet. Nikolaj Vasil'evic Gerbel' (1827-83) translated portions from poems earlier than The Borough, (6) as did Dmitrij Egorovic Min (1818-85), who then proceeded to publish translation of whole of Grimes in 1862. (7) A few years later Gerbel' reprinted Piter Grajms along with other of Min's translations (and his own) in his anthology of English poets, Anglijskie poety v biografijax i obrazcax. It was particularly appropriate that Min should translate Grimes. (8) He published much original poetry in leading literary journals and proved so acceptable translator that, after translating Crabbe (and Schiller's Das Lied von der Glocke in 1856), he proceeded to publish translations of Byron's Siege of Corinth (1873, 1875), part of Byron's Don Juan (1881), Shakespeare's King John (1882), and Dante's Inferno (1885). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it