Commentary: Femoral artery homograft for coronary artery plasty—will it withstand the test of time?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Central MessageFemoral artery homograft has been successfully used for coronary artery plasty in this case report with short-term follow-up, but time-tested verification of its utility is still required.See Article page 232. Femoral artery homograft has been successfully used for coronary artery plasty in this case report with short-term follow-up, but time-tested verification of its utility is still required. See Article page 232. In this issue of JTCVS Techniques, Mosca and colleagues1Mosca R. Chen D. Halpern D. Ma C. Feinberg J. Bhatla P. et al.Femoral artery homograft for coronary artery plasty following arterial switch operation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2020; 4: 232-234Google Scholar present a case report describing the use of femoral artery homograft for stenosis of a single coronary artery system following the arterial switch procedure. While numerous options were considered including bypass grafting and unroofing of the adjacent segment, ultimately the authors proceeded with left main coronary artery patch plasty due to the young patient age of 22 years and the specific anatomy of the lesion. They augmented the coronary artery using femoral artery homograft. At 7 months of follow-up, this patient remained asymptomatic with a coronary computed tomographic angiogram demonstrating a widely patent left main coronary artery. A well-understood complication of any coronary artery surgery, especially of infants undergoing the arterial switch operation, is ostial stenosis presenting either in the immediate postoperative period or during late follow-up. A primary solution in this scenario is patch plasty, which consists of patching across the area of stenosis. Within this report, the authors present the novel use of femoral artery homograft. They suggest that it is a suitable choice due to its natural curvature and tissue properties, such as having an endothelial lining that may make it less thrombogenic compared with other alternatives and its hemostatic properties. As the authors mention, multiple different types of patch materials have been described in the literature for coronary artery patch plasty, including native and treated autologous pericardium, saphenous vein, bovine pericardium, and pulmonary homograft.2Li J. Lai H. Zheng J. Guo C. Gu J. Wang C. Patch repair of anomalous origin of the left main coronary artery from the anterior aortic sinus.Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 97: e59-e61Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar, 3Dion R. Elias B. El Khoury G. Noirhomme P. Verhelst R. Hanet C. Surgical angioplasty of the left main coronary artery.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997; 11: 857-864Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar, 4Karl T.R. Provenzano S.C. Nunn G.R. Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery: a universally applicable surgical strategy.Cardiol Young. 2010; 20: 44-49Crossref PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar, 5Thistlethwaite P.A. Madani M.M. Kriett J.M. Milhoan K. Jamieson S.W. Surgical management of congenital obstruction of the left main coronary artery with supravalvular aortic stenosis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000; 120: 1040-1046Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar, 6Kaczorowski D.J. Sathanandam S. Ravishankar C. Gillespie M.J. Montenegro L.M. Gruber P.J. et al.Coronary ostioplasty for congenital atresia of the left main coronary artery ostium.Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 94: 1307-1310Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar These patch materials each have their own inherent characteristics and limitations. It is well known that autologous pericardium often retracts, thickens, and calcifies over time, and that bovine pericardium too calcifies.7Neethling W.M. Strange G. Firth L. Smit F.E. Evaluation of a tissue-engineered bovine pericardial patch in paediatric patients with congenital cardiac anomalies: initial experience with the ADAPT-treated CardioCel(R) patch.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013; 17: 698-702Crossref PubMed Scopus (51) Google Scholar The primary limitation that remains, however, is that none have been shown to be time-tested and true, including that of femoral artery homograft. The majority of studies, such as the ones referenced herein are case series, and most have little or no follow-up of patch durability. It should also be emphasized that it is just as important to have a technically sound repair. This is important, not only for the initial procedure, but for the reoperation. With respect to the initial procedure, it is important to understand and evaluate the factors that may have led to stenosis, most importantly the anatomy of the vessels in relation to the commissure, the ostial morphology, and the technique used for coronary artery transfer. With respect to the subsequent repair, coronary artery patch plasty must be performed while ensuring that the incision is appropriately beyond the stenosis and that the patch geometry prevents turbulent flow and kinking. However, resolving the debate regarding which patch material is superior is a must and should be done through careful scientific evaluation of a larger number of patients with a longer period of follow-up to determine which material will withstand the test of time. Femoral artery homograft for coronary artery plasty following arterial switch operationJTCVS TechniquesVol. 4PreviewA 22-year-old young man who previously underwent an arterial switch operation (ASO) as an infant for d-transposition of the great arteries with single right coronary artery presented with exertional angina. Echocardiogram demonstrated good repair with preserved biventricular contractility. Stress test was positive for ischemic changes. Cardiac catheterization and coronary computed tomography angiogram (CTA) revealed a single coronary artery that arose from the right facing sinus and bifurcated into a widely patent and dominant right coronary artery and a left main coronary artery (LMCA) that was severely stenosed at its origin (Figure 1, A). Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».