Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results from BE READY, a 56-Week Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study with Randomized Withdrawal
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ConclusionsHigh levels of skin clearance were observed with bimekizumab after one dose and at Week 16, compared with placebo.Clinical responses were durable through 56 weeks, regardless of bimekizumab dosing schedule.Bimekizumab was well-tolerated and the safety profile was consistent with previous studies.4-7 Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab with placebo over 16 weeks in patients with plaque psoriasis, and evaluate the effect of randomized treatment withdrawal, compared with continued treatment, in Week 16 responders. BackgroundBimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that has been rationally designed to selectively inhibit IL-17F in addition to IL-17A.1,2 Both of these interleukins are implicated in the immunopathogenesis of plaque psoriasis (PSO).3 Bimekizumab led to substantial clinical improvements in patients with moderate to severe PSO in the phase 2 BE ABLE study (NCT02905006, NCT03010527), with no unexpected safety findings.4,5 Methods Adult patients with moderate to severe PSO were enrolled in the pivotal phase 3 BE READY study (NCT03410992), which incorporated a 16-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled period followed by a 40-week randomized withdrawal period (Figure 1).• The co-primary endpoints were a 90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1) at Week 16.Secondary endpoints included PASI 100 at Week 16 and PASI 75 at Week 4. Other endpoints included PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 at other timepoints.• Missing data were imputed with non-responder imputation (NRI).• Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were classified using MedDRA version 19.0. Results Patient Population• Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Efficacy• Co-primary endpoints of PASI 90 and IGA 0/1 at Week 16 were achieved by 90.8% and 92.6% of bimekizumab-treated patients, respectively, compared with 1.2% and 1.2% in the placebo group, respectively (p<0.001 for both).• Response was rapid, with over 75% of bimekizumab-treated patients achieving PASI 75 at Week 4, after just one dose (Figure 2).• PASI 90 response was well-maintained in patients re-randomized to bimekizumab, regardless of dosing schedule (Figure 3).• Among patients re-randomized to placebo, loss of response was slow; median time to relapse (loss of PASI 75 response following re-randomization was ~28 weeks (~32 weeks from last bimekizumab dose). Safety• Overall, bimekizumab was well-tolerated; discontinuation due to TEAEs was low, and there were no deaths in the study (Table 2).• All cases of oral candidiasis were localized, mild, or moderate superficial infections, and no cases led to discontinuation (Table 2).The most common TEAEs with bimekizumab were nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis, and upper respiratory tract infection.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».