MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3103727622 · doi:10.25251/skin.4.supp.83

Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Results from BE READY, a 56-Week Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study with Randomized Withdrawal

2020· article· en· W3103727622 on OpenAlexaff
Kenneth B. Gordon, Peter Foley, JG Krueger, Andreas Pinter, Kristian Reich, Ronald Vender, Veerle Vanvoorden, Cindy Madden, Luke Peterson, Andrew Blauvelt

Bibliographic record

VenueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDouble blindedMedicineRandomized controlled trialPlaceboPlaque psoriasisPsoriasisInternal medicineDermatologyAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ConclusionsHigh levels of skin clearance were observed with bimekizumab after one dose and at Week 16, compared with placebo.Clinical responses were durable through 56 weeks, regardless of bimekizumab dosing schedule.Bimekizumab was well-tolerated and the safety profile was consistent with previous studies.4-7 Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab with placebo over 16 weeks in patients with plaque psoriasis, and evaluate the effect of randomized treatment withdrawal, compared with continued treatment, in Week 16 responders. BackgroundBimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that has been rationally designed to selectively inhibit IL-17F in addition to IL-17A.1,2 Both of these interleukins are implicated in the immunopathogenesis of plaque psoriasis (PSO).3 Bimekizumab led to substantial clinical improvements in patients with moderate to severe PSO in the phase 2 BE ABLE study (NCT02905006, NCT03010527), with no unexpected safety findings.4,5 Methods Adult patients with moderate to severe PSO were enrolled in the pivotal phase 3 BE READY study (NCT03410992), which incorporated a 16-week randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled period followed by a 40-week randomized withdrawal period (Figure 1).• The co-primary endpoints were a 90% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1) at Week 16.Secondary endpoints included PASI 100 at Week 16 and PASI 75 at Week 4. Other endpoints included PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 at other timepoints.• Missing data were imputed with non-responder imputation (NRI).• Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were classified using MedDRA version 19.0. Results Patient Population• Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Efficacy• Co-primary endpoints of PASI 90 and IGA 0/1 at Week 16 were achieved by 90.8% and 92.6% of bimekizumab-treated patients, respectively, compared with 1.2% and 1.2% in the placebo group, respectively (p<0.001 for both).• Response was rapid, with over 75% of bimekizumab-treated patients achieving PASI 75 at Week 4, after just one dose (Figure 2).• PASI 90 response was well-maintained in patients re-randomized to bimekizumab, regardless of dosing schedule (Figure 3).• Among patients re-randomized to placebo, loss of response was slow; median time to relapse (loss of PASI 75 response following re-randomization was ~28 weeks (~32 weeks from last bimekizumab dose). Safety• Overall, bimekizumab was well-tolerated; discontinuation due to TEAEs was low, and there were no deaths in the study (Table 2).• All cases of oral candidiasis were localized, mild, or moderate superficial infections, and no cases led to discontinuation (Table 2).The most common TEAEs with bimekizumab were nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis, and upper respiratory tract infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine→Same topicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis→French-language works237,207→