MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3124484007

Integrated Communications, Integrated Marketing Communications and Corporate Reputation: Evidences from Dell Computer Corporations

2012· article· en· W3124484007 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
D.M.N.S.W. Dissanayake

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearchers World – Journal of Arts Science & Commerce · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueMarketing and Advertising Strategies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCorporationMarketingReputationCorporate communicationIntegrated marketing communicationsOrder (exchange)BusinessMarketing communicationMarketing managementRelationship marketingCorporate governanceSociologyFinance
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABSTRACTParticularly, this case study provides a qualitative assessment of facts with regards to the marketing efforts of Dell Incorporation (hereafter Dell, Inc.). More precisely the case encounters aspects with regards to the integrative marketing communication of the desired company. The report discuss about the integrated marketing communication and the impact it has on corporate reputation. Moreover a detailed analysis has been given how the Dell, Inc. is practicing integrated marketing communication at present. The potential to develop an integrative approach with regards to communication has also being given. Finally the report discusses how integrated marketing communications practices can be introduced or improved to the company operations. The implication of the integrated marketing communication with the perspective of finance has also been illustrated in the report.Keywords: Corporate Reputation, Integrated Communications, Integrated Marketing CommunicationsJEL Classifications: M31, O51, M39INTRODUCTION:The Dell, Inc. was formed by Michael Dell in 1984 as PC's Limited. At the time of the first stock offering took place the company changed the name as the Dell Computer Corporation in June 1998. The company was able to commence their business dealings across country boundaries in 1989. The company was able to go outside of the United States to Europe, and the company was able to achieve $50 million of sales turnover. Adding to that the concept of segmentation was initiated in 1993 while integrating a consumer concentrated approach. At the core of the business the company was initiated build-to-order1 strategy. Through this strategy customers were able to order directly, and their orders were routed by means of a credit check and soon after directly to the manufacturing. Finally the orders were then built, tested and eventually shipped to the customer. Adding to that the consumers were able to receive the order 5-7 days after the order was taken place.These strategies were able to reap rich harvest to the company. At the very first beginning the company took steps to reduce the middle man. This strategy was basically formed in order to reduce cost. By implementing this strategy the company was able to pass the benefit to the consumer while reducing the cost of the product. By identifying the customer need the company was able to position their value proposition in a sound manner. Further Dell practiced just-in-time manufacturing as well. Finally they achieved impressive results and gained a competitive advantage.Moreover, the company's product portfolio is diverse. The company has implemented various categories for the each segment of the market. Those are, for home, for small home and office, for small and medium business, for education, government and healthcare and for large enterprises. Sub categories have applied for each main segment. These strategies are vital for the company's success.The company has developed their grassroots across the globe. In almost every country the product is available for consumers. Mainly, the company operates in countries like, US, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, India, China, Japan, Malaysia and Australia.THE CONCEPT OF INTEGRATED COMMUNICATION:Marketing organizations are increasingly paying an emphasis on integrating their messages, procedures, communications within their formal organizational boundaries, (Christensen, Firat & Torp, 2008). Adding to that, it implies a formal centralized approach within the organizational boundaries. Thus Christensen, Firat & Torp, (2008) asserted some potential disadvantages of a formal centralized approach in an organizational perspective. In fact, integrated communication is an important issue in marketing as well, (Christensen, Firat & Torp, 2008). Improper alignment among messages, procedures, and communications in an organization will potentially impact on sub-optimization of communication budgets, (Smith, 1996). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,035

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,021
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,004
Communication savante0,0080,004
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,207
Tête enseignante GPT0,354
Écart entre enseignants0,148 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearchers World – Journal of Arts Science & CommerceMême sujetMarketing and Advertising StrategiesTravaux en français237 207