MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3124484007

Integrated Communications, Integrated Marketing Communications and Corporate Reputation: Evidences from Dell Computer Corporations

2012· article· en· W3124484007 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D.M.N.S.W. Dissanayake

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchers World – Journal of Arts Science & Commerce · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicMarketing and Advertising Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporationMarketingReputationCorporate communicationIntegrated marketing communicationsOrder (exchange)BusinessMarketing communicationMarketing managementRelationship marketingCorporate governanceSociologyFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACTParticularly, this case study provides a qualitative assessment of facts with regards to the marketing efforts of Dell Incorporation (hereafter Dell, Inc.). More precisely the case encounters aspects with regards to the integrative marketing communication of the desired company. The report discuss about the integrated marketing communication and the impact it has on corporate reputation. Moreover a detailed analysis has been given how the Dell, Inc. is practicing integrated marketing communication at present. The potential to develop an integrative approach with regards to communication has also being given. Finally the report discusses how integrated marketing communications practices can be introduced or improved to the company operations. The implication of the integrated marketing communication with the perspective of finance has also been illustrated in the report.Keywords: Corporate Reputation, Integrated Communications, Integrated Marketing CommunicationsJEL Classifications: M31, O51, M39INTRODUCTION:The Dell, Inc. was formed by Michael Dell in 1984 as PC's Limited. At the time of the first stock offering took place the company changed the name as the Dell Computer Corporation in June 1998. The company was able to commence their business dealings across country boundaries in 1989. The company was able to go outside of the United States to Europe, and the company was able to achieve $50 million of sales turnover. Adding to that the concept of segmentation was initiated in 1993 while integrating a consumer concentrated approach. At the core of the business the company was initiated build-to-order1 strategy. Through this strategy customers were able to order directly, and their orders were routed by means of a credit check and soon after directly to the manufacturing. Finally the orders were then built, tested and eventually shipped to the customer. Adding to that the consumers were able to receive the order 5-7 days after the order was taken place.These strategies were able to reap rich harvest to the company. At the very first beginning the company took steps to reduce the middle man. This strategy was basically formed in order to reduce cost. By implementing this strategy the company was able to pass the benefit to the consumer while reducing the cost of the product. By identifying the customer need the company was able to position their value proposition in a sound manner. Further Dell practiced just-in-time manufacturing as well. Finally they achieved impressive results and gained a competitive advantage.Moreover, the company's product portfolio is diverse. The company has implemented various categories for the each segment of the market. Those are, for home, for small home and office, for small and medium business, for education, government and healthcare and for large enterprises. Sub categories have applied for each main segment. These strategies are vital for the company's success.The company has developed their grassroots across the globe. In almost every country the product is available for consumers. Mainly, the company operates in countries like, US, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, India, China, Japan, Malaysia and Australia.THE CONCEPT OF INTEGRATED COMMUNICATION:Marketing organizations are increasingly paying an emphasis on integrating their messages, procedures, communications within their formal organizational boundaries, (Christensen, Firat & Torp, 2008). Adding to that, it implies a formal centralized approach within the organizational boundaries. Thus Christensen, Firat & Torp, (2008) asserted some potential disadvantages of a formal centralized approach in an organizational perspective. In fact, integrated communication is an important issue in marketing as well, (Christensen, Firat & Torp, 2008). Improper alignment among messages, procedures, and communications in an organization will potentially impact on sub-optimization of communication budgets, (Smith, 1996). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearchers World – Journal of Arts Science & CommerceSame topicMarketing and Advertising StrategiesFrench-language works237,207