MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3177439232 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1907

MON-323 IGF-I Variability and Its Association with Demographic and Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Acromegaly Treated with Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligands (SRLS); Results from an International Prospective Phase III Study

2020· article· en· W3177439232 sur OpenAlexaff
Susan L. Samson, Lisa B. Nachtigall, Maria Fleseriu, Ehud Ur, William Henry Ludlam, Gary Patou, Asi Haviv, Yossi Gilgun‐Sherki, Nienke R. Biermasz, Christian J. Strasburger, Laurence Kennedy, Шломо Мелмед

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAcromegalyMedicineOctreotideSomatostatinInternal medicineConcomitantProspective cohort studyPopulationRandomizationDemographicsEndocrinologyClinical trialDemographyGrowth hormoneHormone

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: In clinical practice, most patients responding to injectable somatostatin receptor ligands exhibit IGF-I variability around the upper limit of normal (ULN) during long-term follow up. These fluctuations are thought to result from various factors such as assay variability, nutrition, comorbid conditions, concomitant medications and other unknown factors. The magnitude of this variability, and the factors affecting it, is not well understood in patients with acromegaly treated with injectable SRLs. Methods: IGF-I levels of patients responding to and stably treated with injectable SRLs were measured over time in the CHIASMA OPTIMAL phase III study. Two time periods were assessed - Period 1, three assessments during screening phase before randomization to octreotide capsules (N=56), and Period 2 - multiple assessments up to week 36, in patients rescued with SRL injections for at least 12 weeks (N=21). The time from the last injection to each of the 3 assessments in period 1 [Screening visits 1 and 2 (SV1 & SV2), and Baseline (BL)], was on average 6.8 ± 10.7 (SD), 15.8 ± 2.7, and 29.0 ± 1.8 days respectively. Correlation with various demographics and Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, weight, BMI and residual tumor size to IGF-I variability was assessed. Percent change for each individual patient from Minimal to Maximal IGF-I values within each period was computed and the overall population mean was calculated (lowest value was used as the denominator and all other values were expression as a positive % above this value). Results: The overall mean within-patient percent change of IGF-I levels during Period 1 was 20.48 ± 15.56 (range: 0.6-81). Mean IGF-I levels for SV1, SV2 and BL were 0.78 ± 0.18, 0.79 ± 0.18, and 0.85 ± 0.22 x ULN respectively. The overall increase in mean IGF-I levels from SV1 to BL (longest time interval) was statistically significant (p=0.0002; paired T-test). Analysis of IGF-I levels in patients during Period 2, revealed that the overall mean within-patient percent change of IGF-I levels was 15.27 ± 12.20 (range: 0-41.5). The mean duration of follow up during this period, after patients were already treated for ≥12 weeks with injectable SRL, was 1.72 (± 1.29) months. The variability observed in Period 2 was similar to that observed in the entire sample evaluated in Period 1. No significant differences were found in the mean IGF-I percent change between any demographic or baseline characteristic subgroup examined. Conclusion: IGF-I levels fluctuate in patients with acromegaly who are responsive to injectable SRLs. These fluctuations are wide and can be up to 81% higher than the lowest (most controlled) value, with an average increase of approximately 20%. Significant IGF-I increases were observed at the end of the long acting SRL injection interval. Unless otherwise noted, all abstracts presented at ENDO are embargoed until the date and time of presentation. For oral presentations, the abstracts are embargoed until the session begins. Abstracts presented at a news conference are embargoed until the date and time of the news conference. The Endocrine Society reserves the right to lift the embargo on specific abstracts that are selected for promotion prior to or during ENDO.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,055
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,360

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,275 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the Endocrine SocietyMême sujetPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207