MON-323 IGF-I Variability and Its Association with Demographic and Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Acromegaly Treated with Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligands (SRLS); Results from an International Prospective Phase III Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: In clinical practice, most patients responding to injectable somatostatin receptor ligands exhibit IGF-I variability around the upper limit of normal (ULN) during long-term follow up. These fluctuations are thought to result from various factors such as assay variability, nutrition, comorbid conditions, concomitant medications and other unknown factors. The magnitude of this variability, and the factors affecting it, is not well understood in patients with acromegaly treated with injectable SRLs. Methods: IGF-I levels of patients responding to and stably treated with injectable SRLs were measured over time in the CHIASMA OPTIMAL phase III study. Two time periods were assessed - Period 1, three assessments during screening phase before randomization to octreotide capsules (N=56), and Period 2 - multiple assessments up to week 36, in patients rescued with SRL injections for at least 12 weeks (N=21). The time from the last injection to each of the 3 assessments in period 1 [Screening visits 1 and 2 (SV1 & SV2), and Baseline (BL)], was on average 6.8 ± 10.7 (SD), 15.8 ± 2.7, and 29.0 ± 1.8 days respectively. Correlation with various demographics and Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, weight, BMI and residual tumor size to IGF-I variability was assessed. Percent change for each individual patient from Minimal to Maximal IGF-I values within each period was computed and the overall population mean was calculated (lowest value was used as the denominator and all other values were expression as a positive % above this value). Results: The overall mean within-patient percent change of IGF-I levels during Period 1 was 20.48 ± 15.56 (range: 0.6-81). Mean IGF-I levels for SV1, SV2 and BL were 0.78 ± 0.18, 0.79 ± 0.18, and 0.85 ± 0.22 x ULN respectively. The overall increase in mean IGF-I levels from SV1 to BL (longest time interval) was statistically significant (p=0.0002; paired T-test). Analysis of IGF-I levels in patients during Period 2, revealed that the overall mean within-patient percent change of IGF-I levels was 15.27 ± 12.20 (range: 0-41.5). The mean duration of follow up during this period, after patients were already treated for ≥12 weeks with injectable SRL, was 1.72 (± 1.29) months. The variability observed in Period 2 was similar to that observed in the entire sample evaluated in Period 1. No significant differences were found in the mean IGF-I percent change between any demographic or baseline characteristic subgroup examined. Conclusion: IGF-I levels fluctuate in patients with acromegaly who are responsive to injectable SRLs. These fluctuations are wide and can be up to 81% higher than the lowest (most controlled) value, with an average increase of approximately 20%. Significant IGF-I increases were observed at the end of the long acting SRL injection interval. Unless otherwise noted, all abstracts presented at ENDO are embargoed until the date and time of presentation. For oral presentations, the abstracts are embargoed until the session begins. Abstracts presented at a news conference are embargoed until the date and time of the news conference. The Endocrine Society reserves the right to lift the embargo on specific abstracts that are selected for promotion prior to or during ENDO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".