Itacitinib and Corticosteroids As Initial Treatment for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Phase 1/2 Results from Gravitas-309
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Itacitinib is a potent, selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor with broad anti-inflammatory activity. GRAVITAS-309 was designed as a 2-part, multicenter, randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of itacitinib in combination with corticosteroids (CS) as first-line treatment for moderate or severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We describe preliminary results from the open-label, dose-finding portion of the study. Methods: The study initially investigated itacitinib at doses of 200 mg once daily (qd; n=11) and 300 mg qd (n=10) in combination with CS. Both doses were well tolerated. The trial was then expanded to test itacitinib 400 mg qd and 300 mg twice daily (bid); the initial 300-mg qd cohort was expanded, and a CS monotherapy cohort was added (Figure 1). The expected CS starting dose was 0.5-1 mg/kg per day prednisone (or methylprednisolone equivalent) with a dose taper initiated on Day 14 or earlier during the second week of treatment and following published recommendations (Flowers and Martin. Blood. 2015;125[4]:606-15). Itacitinib dosage was initially reduced by 100 mg when given concomitantly with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (sCYP3A4i; eg, azole antifungals). A total of 140 patients (pts) (35/treatment group) with moderate or severe chronic GVHD were to be randomized 1:1 using chronic GVHD risk status (moderate vs severe) as a stratification factor. The primary objective was to identify the appropriate dose and schedule of itacitinib for further development. The data cutoff was January 31, 2022. Results: 103 pts were enrolled and received at least one dose of itacitinib. The cohorts were well balanced for pt and disease characteristics. Median age was 57 years (range, 23-76) for the itacitinib cohorts and 59 years (range, 28-75) for the CS cohort. Approximately two-thirds of pts had moderate chronic GVHD. At the time of data cut, 39 (38%) pts in the itacitinib cohorts and 10 (28%) pts in the CS cohort continued study treatment. Median duration of study treatment was 27-28 weeks for the itacitinib cohorts (including 13-16 weeks of concomitant CS) and 17 weeks for the CS cohort. The itacitinib 300-mg bid dose cohort was discontinued early due to malignancy relapse occurring in 4/29 (14%) pts and more pts requiring dose reductions compared with the 400-mg qd and 300-mg qd cohorts (28% vs 17% and 8%, respectively), mostly due to cytopenias. Incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was higher in the itacitinib cohorts than with CS (65% vs 31%) and were reported most commonly in the system organ classes of infections (44% vs 6%) and blood and lymphatic system disorders (23%-34% vs 6%). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections occurred in 10%-15% of pts in itacitinib cohorts (including CMV pneumonia [n=3], esophagitis [n=1], enteritis [n=1]) vs 3% with CS. The all-cause mortality rate was 14%-18% in itacitinib cohorts vs 11% with CS, with infections the leading cause. The overall response rate (ORR) at 6 months was 46% (complete response [CR], 14%) with 300-mg qd and 53% (CR, 32%) with 400-mg qd, vs 36% (CR, 18%) with CS. A preliminary exposure-response analysis showed a bell-shaped curve with maximum efficacy decreasing at higher exposures, consistent with increasing incidence of AEs. 60%-70% of patients received coadministration with a sCYP3A4i at any time point during study treatment, which increased itacitinib exposure across all doses, requiring dose reduction by 200 mg qd. Conclusion: Preliminary results for first-line treatment of moderate or severe chronic GVHD showed an increase in ORR and CR rate with itacitinib + CS vs CS alone in both the 300-mg qd and 400-mg qd cohorts, at the expense of increased rates of cytopenias, infections, and mortality. This benefit:risk ratio does not support moving the combination of itacitinib + CS to a later phase of development in first-line therapy of chronic GVHD. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».