Itacitinib and Corticosteroids As Initial Treatment for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Phase 1/2 Results from Gravitas-309
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Itacitinib is a potent, selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor with broad anti-inflammatory activity. GRAVITAS-309 was designed as a 2-part, multicenter, randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of itacitinib in combination with corticosteroids (CS) as first-line treatment for moderate or severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We describe preliminary results from the open-label, dose-finding portion of the study. Methods: The study initially investigated itacitinib at doses of 200 mg once daily (qd; n=11) and 300 mg qd (n=10) in combination with CS. Both doses were well tolerated. The trial was then expanded to test itacitinib 400 mg qd and 300 mg twice daily (bid); the initial 300-mg qd cohort was expanded, and a CS monotherapy cohort was added (Figure 1). The expected CS starting dose was 0.5-1 mg/kg per day prednisone (or methylprednisolone equivalent) with a dose taper initiated on Day 14 or earlier during the second week of treatment and following published recommendations (Flowers and Martin. Blood. 2015;125[4]:606-15). Itacitinib dosage was initially reduced by 100 mg when given concomitantly with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (sCYP3A4i; eg, azole antifungals). A total of 140 patients (pts) (35/treatment group) with moderate or severe chronic GVHD were to be randomized 1:1 using chronic GVHD risk status (moderate vs severe) as a stratification factor. The primary objective was to identify the appropriate dose and schedule of itacitinib for further development. The data cutoff was January 31, 2022. Results: 103 pts were enrolled and received at least one dose of itacitinib. The cohorts were well balanced for pt and disease characteristics. Median age was 57 years (range, 23-76) for the itacitinib cohorts and 59 years (range, 28-75) for the CS cohort. Approximately two-thirds of pts had moderate chronic GVHD. At the time of data cut, 39 (38%) pts in the itacitinib cohorts and 10 (28%) pts in the CS cohort continued study treatment. Median duration of study treatment was 27-28 weeks for the itacitinib cohorts (including 13-16 weeks of concomitant CS) and 17 weeks for the CS cohort. The itacitinib 300-mg bid dose cohort was discontinued early due to malignancy relapse occurring in 4/29 (14%) pts and more pts requiring dose reductions compared with the 400-mg qd and 300-mg qd cohorts (28% vs 17% and 8%, respectively), mostly due to cytopenias. Incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was higher in the itacitinib cohorts than with CS (65% vs 31%) and were reported most commonly in the system organ classes of infections (44% vs 6%) and blood and lymphatic system disorders (23%-34% vs 6%). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections occurred in 10%-15% of pts in itacitinib cohorts (including CMV pneumonia [n=3], esophagitis [n=1], enteritis [n=1]) vs 3% with CS. The all-cause mortality rate was 14%-18% in itacitinib cohorts vs 11% with CS, with infections the leading cause. The overall response rate (ORR) at 6 months was 46% (complete response [CR], 14%) with 300-mg qd and 53% (CR, 32%) with 400-mg qd, vs 36% (CR, 18%) with CS. A preliminary exposure-response analysis showed a bell-shaped curve with maximum efficacy decreasing at higher exposures, consistent with increasing incidence of AEs. 60%-70% of patients received coadministration with a sCYP3A4i at any time point during study treatment, which increased itacitinib exposure across all doses, requiring dose reduction by 200 mg qd. Conclusion: Preliminary results for first-line treatment of moderate or severe chronic GVHD showed an increase in ORR and CR rate with itacitinib + CS vs CS alone in both the 300-mg qd and 400-mg qd cohorts, at the expense of increased rates of cytopenias, infections, and mortality. This benefit:risk ratio does not support moving the combination of itacitinib + CS to a later phase of development in first-line therapy of chronic GVHD. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".