MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4310105223 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-163625

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Pegcetacoplan Treatment in Adults with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

2022· article· en· W4310105223 sur OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. Patriquin, Andrija Bogdanović, Morag Griffin, Richard Kelly, Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski, Brian Mulherin, Régis Peffault de Latour, Alexander Roeth, Veena Selvaratnam, Jeff Szer, Jessica Savage, Regina Horneff, Lisa Tan, Michael Yeh, Jens Panse

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueComplement system in diseases
Établissements canadiensToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaMedicineTerm (time)Internal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening disease characterized by complement-mediated hemolysis and thrombosis. Pegcetacoplan (PEG) is the first approved C3 inhibitor for US adults with PNH and EU adults with PNH who are anemic after treatment with a C5 inhibitor for ≥3 months. In 5 clinical trials, PEG significantly improved hemoglobin (Hb) and other disease parameters in patients with PNH who were anemic, despite eculizumab (ECU) treatment, or who were naïve to complement inhibitors. We present 48-week data from our ongoing extension study (study 307; NCT03531255) designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety in patients previously enrolled in PEG clinical trials. Methods: This open-label, multicenter extension study enrolled adults with PNH who completed previous PEG phase I, II and III trials. Patients from PHAROAH (Phase 1) and PEGASUS (Phase 3) had baseline Hb <10.5 g/dL despite ≥3 months of stable ECU dosing. Over a third of PEGASUS patients entered the study on higher-than-approved doses of ECU, with high transfusion burden, and were chronically anemic. Patients from PADDOCK (Phase 1b), PALOMINO (Phase 2a), and PRINCE (Phase 3) trials were complement inhibitor-naïve at baseline. The current study continued patients on their current PEG dose (1080 mg subcutaneous [SC] twice weekly or every 3 days, PEGASUS and PRINCE) or switched patients to 1080 mg SC PEG treatment (PHAROAH, PADDOCK, PALOMINO). Efficacy was evaluated with mean hematologic values (Hb, lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue score, and transfusion avoidance (i.e., patients [%] who did not require transfusion during the 48 weeks; patients who withdrew did not meet transfusion avoidance criteria). The proportion of patients with normalized Hb and LDH levels was determined. Post hoc analyses determined mean change from baseline to Week 48 for Hb, LDH, and FACIT-Fatigue scores. Safety was assessed by evaluating the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 137 of 145 patients who completed a previous PEG trial chose to enter the extension study and 107 had received 48 weeks of treatment at the time of data cutoff in addition to the treated time in the parent study. Total 1080 mg twice weekly PEG exposure ranged from 74 weeks (PRINCE) to 96 weeks (PEGASUS). At baseline, mean (SD; median) Hb was 11.6 g/dL (2 g/dL; 11.8 g/dL). At week 48, Hb was also 11.6 g/dL (1.9 g/dL; 11.7 g/dL), and 35.1% of patients had normal Hb per sex-specified norms. Baseline mean (SD; median) LDH was 284.2 U/L (380 U/L; 181.5 U/L). At week 48, mean (SD; median) LDH was 274.2 U/L (319.1 U/L; 180.1 U/L), and 73.2% of patients had normalized LDH levels. Baseline mean (SD; median) FACIT-fatigue was 42.8 (8.8; 46.0). At week 48, mean (SD; median) FACIT-fatigue was 42.4 (9.8; 45.0). Baseline Hb, LDH, and FACIT-fatigue scores were well maintained throughout the study (Figure). Transfusion avoidance was achieved in 83.2% of patients through Week 48. Most patients had an AE (73.7%) through Week 48; 16.1% of AEs were judged by investigators to be related to PEG. The most common treatment-emergent AE was hemolysis, reported in 16.8% of patients (14/64 PEGASUS patients, 6/50 PRINCE patients). Serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 19.7% of patients. No SAEs were judged related to PEG. The most commonly reported SAE was hemolysis (8% of patients). Of the 11 patients with an SAE of hemolysis, 9 were from the PEGASUS study. Seven of these 9 patients received an increased PEG dose (2 of the 7 also received an ECU dose), and only 3 required transfusions. All serious hemolytic events resolved. Injection site reactions occurred in 10.9% of patients; most were mild and transient. No thrombotic events or meningitis infections were reported. Three patients discontinued due to hemolysis. One death occurred (sudden cardiac event); it was deemed unrelated to PEG. Conclusions: These long-term results show that pegcetacoplan treatment sustains robust improvements in Hb, LDH and fatigue in patients with PNH, and reduces the need for transfusions. Normalization of hematologic parameters is achievable with pegcetacoplan. The long-term safety data corroborate the favorable safety profile reported in previous clinical trials. An evaluation of the safety and efficacy of intensive subcutaneous or intravenous dosing of pegcetacoplan in order to treat acute hemolytic events is underway. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetComplement system in diseasesTravaux en français237 207