MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310105223 · doi:10.1182/blood-2022-163625

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Pegcetacoplan Treatment in Adults with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria

2022· article· en· W4310105223 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J. Patriquin, Andrija Bogdanović, Morag Griffin, Richard Kelly, Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski, Brian Mulherin, Régis Peffault de Latour, Alexander Roeth, Veena Selvaratnam, Jeff Szer, Jessica Savage, Regina Horneff, Lisa Tan, Michael Yeh, Jens Panse

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicComplement system in diseases
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaMedicineTerm (time)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare, life-threatening disease characterized by complement-mediated hemolysis and thrombosis. Pegcetacoplan (PEG) is the first approved C3 inhibitor for US adults with PNH and EU adults with PNH who are anemic after treatment with a C5 inhibitor for ≥3 months. In 5 clinical trials, PEG significantly improved hemoglobin (Hb) and other disease parameters in patients with PNH who were anemic, despite eculizumab (ECU) treatment, or who were naïve to complement inhibitors. We present 48-week data from our ongoing extension study (study 307; NCT03531255) designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety in patients previously enrolled in PEG clinical trials. Methods: This open-label, multicenter extension study enrolled adults with PNH who completed previous PEG phase I, II and III trials. Patients from PHAROAH (Phase 1) and PEGASUS (Phase 3) had baseline Hb <10.5 g/dL despite ≥3 months of stable ECU dosing. Over a third of PEGASUS patients entered the study on higher-than-approved doses of ECU, with high transfusion burden, and were chronically anemic. Patients from PADDOCK (Phase 1b), PALOMINO (Phase 2a), and PRINCE (Phase 3) trials were complement inhibitor-naïve at baseline. The current study continued patients on their current PEG dose (1080 mg subcutaneous [SC] twice weekly or every 3 days, PEGASUS and PRINCE) or switched patients to 1080 mg SC PEG treatment (PHAROAH, PADDOCK, PALOMINO). Efficacy was evaluated with mean hematologic values (Hb, lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue score, and transfusion avoidance (i.e., patients [%] who did not require transfusion during the 48 weeks; patients who withdrew did not meet transfusion avoidance criteria). The proportion of patients with normalized Hb and LDH levels was determined. Post hoc analyses determined mean change from baseline to Week 48 for Hb, LDH, and FACIT-Fatigue scores. Safety was assessed by evaluating the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 137 of 145 patients who completed a previous PEG trial chose to enter the extension study and 107 had received 48 weeks of treatment at the time of data cutoff in addition to the treated time in the parent study. Total 1080 mg twice weekly PEG exposure ranged from 74 weeks (PRINCE) to 96 weeks (PEGASUS). At baseline, mean (SD; median) Hb was 11.6 g/dL (2 g/dL; 11.8 g/dL). At week 48, Hb was also 11.6 g/dL (1.9 g/dL; 11.7 g/dL), and 35.1% of patients had normal Hb per sex-specified norms. Baseline mean (SD; median) LDH was 284.2 U/L (380 U/L; 181.5 U/L). At week 48, mean (SD; median) LDH was 274.2 U/L (319.1 U/L; 180.1 U/L), and 73.2% of patients had normalized LDH levels. Baseline mean (SD; median) FACIT-fatigue was 42.8 (8.8; 46.0). At week 48, mean (SD; median) FACIT-fatigue was 42.4 (9.8; 45.0). Baseline Hb, LDH, and FACIT-fatigue scores were well maintained throughout the study (Figure). Transfusion avoidance was achieved in 83.2% of patients through Week 48. Most patients had an AE (73.7%) through Week 48; 16.1% of AEs were judged by investigators to be related to PEG. The most common treatment-emergent AE was hemolysis, reported in 16.8% of patients (14/64 PEGASUS patients, 6/50 PRINCE patients). Serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 19.7% of patients. No SAEs were judged related to PEG. The most commonly reported SAE was hemolysis (8% of patients). Of the 11 patients with an SAE of hemolysis, 9 were from the PEGASUS study. Seven of these 9 patients received an increased PEG dose (2 of the 7 also received an ECU dose), and only 3 required transfusions. All serious hemolytic events resolved. Injection site reactions occurred in 10.9% of patients; most were mild and transient. No thrombotic events or meningitis infections were reported. Three patients discontinued due to hemolysis. One death occurred (sudden cardiac event); it was deemed unrelated to PEG. Conclusions: These long-term results show that pegcetacoplan treatment sustains robust improvements in Hb, LDH and fatigue in patients with PNH, and reduces the need for transfusions. Normalization of hematologic parameters is achievable with pegcetacoplan. The long-term safety data corroborate the favorable safety profile reported in previous clinical trials. An evaluation of the safety and efficacy of intensive subcutaneous or intravenous dosing of pegcetacoplan in order to treat acute hemolytic events is underway. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicComplement system in diseasesFrench-language works237,207