S736 Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib Induction Therapy in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease: Results From a Randomized Phase 3 U-EXCEL Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Eligible patients(N=526) with moderate to severe active Crohn’s Disease(CD), defined as average daily stool frequency(SF)≥4 and/or abdominal pain score(APS)≥2, and a Simple Endoscopic Score for CD(SES-CD) (excluding the narrowing component subscore) ≥6(≥4 for subjects with isolated ileal disease). Methods: Patients(pts) were randomized 2:1 to UPA45 or PBO for 12 weeks(wks). Pts on baseline corticosteroids(CS) initiated a protocolized tapering at wk4. The co-primary endpoints, clinical remission(per CDAI for US [CDAI< 150] or per SF/APS for EU [average daily SF ≤2.8 and APS≤1.0 and neither greater than baseline [BL]) and endoscopic response(decrease in SES-CD >50% from BL or ≥2-point reduction from BL for pts with a BL SES-CD=4), were evaluated at wk 12. Safety, primary and key secondary clinical, and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated through wk 12. Results: BL demographics and characteristics were similar between groups; 45.4% of pts had a history of prior biologic use or failure. At wk 12, significantly more pts receiving UPA45 vs PBO achieved the co-primary endpoints: clinical remission(per CDAI, UPA45 49.5% vs PBO 29.1%; per SF/APS, UPA45 50.7% vs PBO 22.2%) and endoscopic response (UPA45 45.5% vs PBO 13.1%) (P< .0001 for all endpoints; Table). UPA45 was superior to PBO for most of the ranked secondary endpoints including clinical remission per CDAI and SF/APS at wk 4, CS-free clinical remission per CDAI and SF/APS at wk 12, clinical response(CR-100; 100-point decrease in CDAI from BL at wk 2 and wk 12, and endoscopic remission at wk 12(P< .0001 or P< .01, Table). Severe AEs occurred at 8.9% and 8.5% within UPA45 and PBO groups, respectively. The most common AEs(≥5% of pts) were acne and anemia among pts treated with UPA, and CD exacerbation among pts receiving PBO. Serious infections were 1.1% and 1.7% for UPA45 and PBO groups, respectively. Herpes zoster(2.9%) was reported in the UPA45 group only, and an adjudicated cardiovascular event(0.6%) was reported only in the PBO group. No treatment-emergent deaths, malignancies, other opportunistic infections, adjudicated gastrointestinal perforations or adjudicated thrombotic events were reported in either group. Conclusion: UPA45 induction therapy was superior to PBO in achieving early response, including clinical remission, endoscopic response, and CS-free clinical remission during the U-EXCEL study. UPA45 was well tolerated, with no new safety risks and a safety profile comparable to previous UPA studies. Table 1. - Co-primary and Key Secondary Endpoints Endpoint PBO (N=176)% [95% CI] g UPA 45 mg QD (N=350)% [95% CI] g Difference vs. PBO% [95% CI] h Co-Primary Endpoints Clinical remission, wk 12 Per CDAI a Per SF/APS b 29.1 [22.4, 35.8]22.2 [16.0, 28.3] 49.5 [44.2, 54.8]50.7 [45.5, 56.0] 20.8 [12.7, 28.8]**28.7 [20.9, 36.4]** Endoscopic response c , wk 12 13.1 [8.1, 18.0] 45.5 [40.3, 50.8] 33.0 [26.2, 39.9]** Key Secondary Endpoints Clinical Remission, wk 4 Per CDAI a Per SF/APS b 26.7 [20.2, 33.3]14.8 [9.5, 20.0] 37.1 [32.1, 42.2]35.7 [30.7, 40.7] 10.8 [2.9, 18.6]*21.2 [14.3, 28.2]** Corticosteroid-free clinical remission, wk 12 per CDAI d per SF/APS d (N=64)15.7 [6.8, 24.7]12.5 [4.4, 20.6] (N=126)42.9 [34.2, 51.5]44.4 [35.8, 53.1] 27.7 [15.7, 39.8]**32.6 [21.5, 43.7]** Clinical Response CR-100 e Week 2 Week 12 20.4 [14.4, 26.5]37.3 [30.1, 44.5] 32.2 [27.3, 37.1]56.6 [51.4, 61.8] 11.7 [4.2, 19.2]*19.8 [11.3, 28.4]** Endoscopic remission f , wk 12 7.4 [3.5, 11.3] 28.9 [24.2, 33.7] 21.8 [15.8, 27.8]** Patient randomization was stratified by baseline corticosteroid use, endoscopic disease severity, and the number of previously failed biologics. All patients within this dataset were included here within the ITT population.aClinical remission per CDAI = per US, CDAI < 150.bClinical remission per SF/APS = per EU, average daily SF ≤ 2.8 and average daily APS ≤ 1.0 and both not greater than baselinecEndoscopic response = decrease in SES-CD > 50% from baseline (or for subjects with a baseline SES-CD of 4, at least a 2-point reduction from baseline), as scored by a central reviewer.dCorticosteroid-free clinical remission = discontinuation of corticosteroid use and achievement of clinical remission per CDAI or SF/APS at wk 12 among patients on corticosteroids at baseline.eClinical response-100 = decrease of ≥ 100 points in CDAI from baseline.fEndoscopic remission = SES-CD ≤ 4, at least a 2-point reduction versus baseline and no subscore >1 in any individual variable, as scored by a central reviewer.gResults are based on non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C).h95% CI for adjusted difference and p-value are calculated according to the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for randomization strata.**P ≤ .0001 or *P ≤ .01 vs PBO; Average daily abdominal pain score, APS; Coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19; Confidence Interval, CI; Crohn’s Disease Activity Index, CDAI; Simple Endoscopic Score for CD, SES-CD, Placebo, PBO; Once daily, QD; average daily very soft/liquid stool frequency, SF; Upadacitinib, UPA.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».