MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S736 Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib Induction Therapy in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Crohn’s Disease: Results From a Randomized Phase 3 U-EXCEL Study

2022· article· en· W4316086281 on OpenAlexaff
Edward V. Loftus, Jean‐Frédéric Colombel, Ana P. Lacerda, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Geert D’Haens, Remo Panaccione, Walter Reinisch, Édouard Louis, Minhu Chen, Hiroshi Nakase, Susan Greenbloom, George DuVall, Yuri Sanchez-Gonzalez, Mohamed‐Eslam F. Mohamed, Susan Rhee, Elena Dubcenco, Julián Panés

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClinical endpointInternal medicineGastroenterologyColonoscopyDemographicsPhases of clinical researchCrohn's diseaseRandomized controlled trialClinical trialAbdominal painSurgeryDiseaseColorectal cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Eligible patients(N=526) with moderate to severe active Crohn’s Disease(CD), defined as average daily stool frequency(SF)≥4 and/or abdominal pain score(APS)≥2, and a Simple Endoscopic Score for CD(SES-CD) (excluding the narrowing component subscore) ≥6(≥4 for subjects with isolated ileal disease). Methods: Patients(pts) were randomized 2:1 to UPA45 or PBO for 12 weeks(wks). Pts on baseline corticosteroids(CS) initiated a protocolized tapering at wk4. The co-primary endpoints, clinical remission(per CDAI for US [CDAI< 150] or per SF/APS for EU [average daily SF ≤2.8 and APS≤1.0 and neither greater than baseline [BL]) and endoscopic response(decrease in SES-CD >50% from BL or ≥2-point reduction from BL for pts with a BL SES-CD=4), were evaluated at wk 12. Safety, primary and key secondary clinical, and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated through wk 12. Results: BL demographics and characteristics were similar between groups; 45.4% of pts had a history of prior biologic use or failure. At wk 12, significantly more pts receiving UPA45 vs PBO achieved the co-primary endpoints: clinical remission(per CDAI, UPA45 49.5% vs PBO 29.1%; per SF/APS, UPA45 50.7% vs PBO 22.2%) and endoscopic response (UPA45 45.5% vs PBO 13.1%) (P< .0001 for all endpoints; Table). UPA45 was superior to PBO for most of the ranked secondary endpoints including clinical remission per CDAI and SF/APS at wk 4, CS-free clinical remission per CDAI and SF/APS at wk 12, clinical response(CR-100; 100-point decrease in CDAI from BL at wk 2 and wk 12, and endoscopic remission at wk 12(P< .0001 or P< .01, Table). Severe AEs occurred at 8.9% and 8.5% within UPA45 and PBO groups, respectively. The most common AEs(≥5% of pts) were acne and anemia among pts treated with UPA, and CD exacerbation among pts receiving PBO. Serious infections were 1.1% and 1.7% for UPA45 and PBO groups, respectively. Herpes zoster(2.9%) was reported in the UPA45 group only, and an adjudicated cardiovascular event(0.6%) was reported only in the PBO group. No treatment-emergent deaths, malignancies, other opportunistic infections, adjudicated gastrointestinal perforations or adjudicated thrombotic events were reported in either group. Conclusion: UPA45 induction therapy was superior to PBO in achieving early response, including clinical remission, endoscopic response, and CS-free clinical remission during the U-EXCEL study. UPA45 was well tolerated, with no new safety risks and a safety profile comparable to previous UPA studies. Table 1. - Co-primary and Key Secondary Endpoints Endpoint PBO (N=176)% [95% CI] g UPA 45 mg QD (N=350)% [95% CI] g Difference vs. PBO% [95% CI] h Co-Primary Endpoints Clinical remission, wk 12 Per CDAI a Per SF/APS b 29.1 [22.4, 35.8]22.2 [16.0, 28.3] 49.5 [44.2, 54.8]50.7 [45.5, 56.0] 20.8 [12.7, 28.8]**28.7 [20.9, 36.4]** Endoscopic response c , wk 12 13.1 [8.1, 18.0] 45.5 [40.3, 50.8] 33.0 [26.2, 39.9]** Key Secondary Endpoints Clinical Remission, wk 4 Per CDAI a Per SF/APS b 26.7 [20.2, 33.3]14.8 [9.5, 20.0] 37.1 [32.1, 42.2]35.7 [30.7, 40.7] 10.8 [2.9, 18.6]*21.2 [14.3, 28.2]** Corticosteroid-free clinical remission, wk 12 per CDAI d per SF/APS d (N=64)15.7 [6.8, 24.7]12.5 [4.4, 20.6] (N=126)42.9 [34.2, 51.5]44.4 [35.8, 53.1] 27.7 [15.7, 39.8]**32.6 [21.5, 43.7]** Clinical Response CR-100 e Week 2 Week 12 20.4 [14.4, 26.5]37.3 [30.1, 44.5] 32.2 [27.3, 37.1]56.6 [51.4, 61.8] 11.7 [4.2, 19.2]*19.8 [11.3, 28.4]** Endoscopic remission f , wk 12 7.4 [3.5, 11.3] 28.9 [24.2, 33.7] 21.8 [15.8, 27.8]** Patient randomization was stratified by baseline corticosteroid use, endoscopic disease severity, and the number of previously failed biologics. All patients within this dataset were included here within the ITT population.aClinical remission per CDAI = per US, CDAI < 150.bClinical remission per SF/APS = per EU, average daily SF ≤ 2.8 and average daily APS ≤ 1.0 and both not greater than baselinecEndoscopic response = decrease in SES-CD > 50% from baseline (or for subjects with a baseline SES-CD of 4, at least a 2-point reduction from baseline), as scored by a central reviewer.dCorticosteroid-free clinical remission = discontinuation of corticosteroid use and achievement of clinical remission per CDAI or SF/APS at wk 12 among patients on corticosteroids at baseline.eClinical response-100 = decrease of ≥ 100 points in CDAI from baseline.fEndoscopic remission = SES-CD ≤ 4, at least a 2-point reduction versus baseline and no subscore >1 in any individual variable, as scored by a central reviewer.gResults are based on non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C).h95% CI for adjusted difference and p-value are calculated according to the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for randomization strata.**P ≤ .0001 or *P ≤ .01 vs PBO; Average daily abdominal pain score, APS; Coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19; Confidence Interval, CI; Crohn’s Disease Activity Index, CDAI; Simple Endoscopic Score for CD, SES-CD, Placebo, PBO; Once daily, QD; average daily very soft/liquid stool frequency, SF; Upadacitinib, UPA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→