A172 THE LACK OF CHROMOGRANIN A PROTECTS THE COLONIC EPITHELIAL BARRIER FUNCTIONS FROM COLITIS IN MALE MICE AND EXACERBATES COLITIS IN FEMALE MICE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with compromised mucosal barrier function and colonic epithelial repair in a sex-dependent manner. Chromogranin A (CHGA), a pro-hormone, correlates positively with UC disease severity. In male mice, deletion of CHGA has been shown to decrease the inflammatory process; however, the effect of CHGA on mucosal barrier function and colonic epithelial repair between males and females is unknown. Purpose We investigated whether the lack of CHGA modulates gut barrier function, mucosa integrity, and colonic epithelial repair between males and females in a mice model of colitis. Method Male and female wild-type (WT) and CHGA (CHGA-/-) deficient mice (13-17 weeks old) were given 5% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) to induce colitis or water for 5-days (n=5-8 mice per group). The disease activity index (DAI) was assessed. Colons were collected, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-25 concentrations were measured by ELISA. Expression of structural and functional markers specific to epithelial cells, namely, colonocytes (Na-K-Cl cotransporter [Nkcc]1), goblet cells function (resistin-like molecule [Relm]β), and mucin [MUC]2) and stem cells (reserve Hopx, fast-cycling Lgr5, and fetal-like Ly6a cells) were evaluated by qRT-PCR. Result(s) Colitic male CHGA-/- did not show significant changes in DAI compared to WT mice. Conversely, female CHGA-/- mice demonstrated a trend toward higher susceptibility to colitis compared to female WT mice with increased weight loss and bleeding. This was associated with elevated levels of colonic TNF-α and IL-25 (p<0.05) in CHGA-/- females compared to CHGA-/- males. TNF-α levels were not different between female groups at baseline and during colitis. While colitic CHGA-/- female had elevated Relmβ expression (p<0.01) compared to WT mice. No significative change was noted in Relmβ expression between female WT mice at baseline and during colitis. Similarly, Nkcc1 and Muc2 expression was not different between female groups. By contrast, male CHGA-/- were less susceptible to colitis than male WT mice with elevated Nkcc1and a lower Relmβ and Muc2 expression (p<0.01). In colitis, expression of stem cell markers, Hopx and Lgr5, was markedly reduced in all groups, while male WT, CHGA-/-, and female WT had elevated Ly6a expression. However, the magnitude of Hopx and Ly6a expression was associated with sex. Thus, colitic male CHGA-/- mice had a higher Hopx expression than male WT and female CHGA-/ - mice, with a lower reduction of 1.9 compared to 4.9 and 6.6, respectively (p<0.05, 0.01, and 0.0001). While colitic male CHGA-/- mice had elevated Ly6a expression (p<0.05) in contrast to female CHGA-/- mice (p=0.5). The magnitude of the decrease in Lgr5 expression was not different between all groups. Conclusion(s) In the absence of CHGA, male mice preserved their colonic mucosa integrity and repair potential, while female mice suffered significant loss of mucosa integrity and repair potential during colitis. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».