MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323353479 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.172

A172 THE LACK OF CHROMOGRANIN A PROTECTS THE COLONIC EPITHELIAL BARRIER FUNCTIONS FROM COLITIS IN MALE MICE AND EXACERBATES COLITIS IN FEMALE MICE

2023· article· en· W4323353479 on OpenAlexaff
D M Tshikudi, A. Diarra, J -E Ghia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColitisChromogranin ABarrier functionMucinInternal medicineInflammatory bowel diseaseUlcerative colitisMedicineEndocrinologyAndrologyBiologyImmunologyPathologyImmunohistochemistryDiseaseCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with compromised mucosal barrier function and colonic epithelial repair in a sex-dependent manner. Chromogranin A (CHGA), a pro-hormone, correlates positively with UC disease severity. In male mice, deletion of CHGA has been shown to decrease the inflammatory process; however, the effect of CHGA on mucosal barrier function and colonic epithelial repair between males and females is unknown. Purpose We investigated whether the lack of CHGA modulates gut barrier function, mucosa integrity, and colonic epithelial repair between males and females in a mice model of colitis. Method Male and female wild-type (WT) and CHGA (CHGA-/-) deficient mice (13-17 weeks old) were given 5% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) to induce colitis or water for 5-days (n=5-8 mice per group). The disease activity index (DAI) was assessed. Colons were collected, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-25 concentrations were measured by ELISA. Expression of structural and functional markers specific to epithelial cells, namely, colonocytes (Na-K-Cl cotransporter [Nkcc]1), goblet cells function (resistin-like molecule [Relm]β), and mucin [MUC]2) and stem cells (reserve Hopx, fast-cycling Lgr5, and fetal-like Ly6a cells) were evaluated by qRT-PCR. Result(s) Colitic male CHGA-/- did not show significant changes in DAI compared to WT mice. Conversely, female CHGA-/- mice demonstrated a trend toward higher susceptibility to colitis compared to female WT mice with increased weight loss and bleeding. This was associated with elevated levels of colonic TNF-α and IL-25 (p<0.05) in CHGA-/- females compared to CHGA-/- males. TNF-α levels were not different between female groups at baseline and during colitis. While colitic CHGA-/- female had elevated Relmβ expression (p<0.01) compared to WT mice. No significative change was noted in Relmβ expression between female WT mice at baseline and during colitis. Similarly, Nkcc1 and Muc2 expression was not different between female groups. By contrast, male CHGA-/- were less susceptible to colitis than male WT mice with elevated Nkcc1and a lower Relmβ and Muc2 expression (p<0.01). In colitis, expression of stem cell markers, Hopx and Lgr5, was markedly reduced in all groups, while male WT, CHGA-/-, and female WT had elevated Ly6a expression. However, the magnitude of Hopx and Ly6a expression was associated with sex. Thus, colitic male CHGA-/- mice had a higher Hopx expression than male WT and female CHGA-/ - mice, with a lower reduction of 1.9 compared to 4.9 and 6.6, respectively (p<0.05, 0.01, and 0.0001). While colitic male CHGA-/- mice had elevated Ly6a expression (p<0.05) in contrast to female CHGA-/- mice (p=0.5). The magnitude of the decrease in Lgr5 expression was not different between all groups. Conclusion(s) In the absence of CHGA, male mice preserved their colonic mucosa integrity and repair potential, while female mice suffered significant loss of mucosa integrity and repair potential during colitis. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207