A172 THE LACK OF CHROMOGRANIN A PROTECTS THE COLONIC EPITHELIAL BARRIER FUNCTIONS FROM COLITIS IN MALE MICE AND EXACERBATES COLITIS IN FEMALE MICE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is associated with compromised mucosal barrier function and colonic epithelial repair in a sex-dependent manner. Chromogranin A (CHGA), a pro-hormone, correlates positively with UC disease severity. In male mice, deletion of CHGA has been shown to decrease the inflammatory process; however, the effect of CHGA on mucosal barrier function and colonic epithelial repair between males and females is unknown. Purpose We investigated whether the lack of CHGA modulates gut barrier function, mucosa integrity, and colonic epithelial repair between males and females in a mice model of colitis. Method Male and female wild-type (WT) and CHGA (CHGA-/-) deficient mice (13-17 weeks old) were given 5% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) to induce colitis or water for 5-days (n=5-8 mice per group). The disease activity index (DAI) was assessed. Colons were collected, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-25 concentrations were measured by ELISA. Expression of structural and functional markers specific to epithelial cells, namely, colonocytes (Na-K-Cl cotransporter [Nkcc]1), goblet cells function (resistin-like molecule [Relm]β), and mucin [MUC]2) and stem cells (reserve Hopx, fast-cycling Lgr5, and fetal-like Ly6a cells) were evaluated by qRT-PCR. Result(s) Colitic male CHGA-/- did not show significant changes in DAI compared to WT mice. Conversely, female CHGA-/- mice demonstrated a trend toward higher susceptibility to colitis compared to female WT mice with increased weight loss and bleeding. This was associated with elevated levels of colonic TNF-α and IL-25 (p<0.05) in CHGA-/- females compared to CHGA-/- males. TNF-α levels were not different between female groups at baseline and during colitis. While colitic CHGA-/- female had elevated Relmβ expression (p<0.01) compared to WT mice. No significative change was noted in Relmβ expression between female WT mice at baseline and during colitis. Similarly, Nkcc1 and Muc2 expression was not different between female groups. By contrast, male CHGA-/- were less susceptible to colitis than male WT mice with elevated Nkcc1and a lower Relmβ and Muc2 expression (p<0.01). In colitis, expression of stem cell markers, Hopx and Lgr5, was markedly reduced in all groups, while male WT, CHGA-/-, and female WT had elevated Ly6a expression. However, the magnitude of Hopx and Ly6a expression was associated with sex. Thus, colitic male CHGA-/- mice had a higher Hopx expression than male WT and female CHGA-/ - mice, with a lower reduction of 1.9 compared to 4.9 and 6.6, respectively (p<0.05, 0.01, and 0.0001). While colitic male CHGA-/- mice had elevated Ly6a expression (p<0.05) in contrast to female CHGA-/- mice (p=0.5). The magnitude of the decrease in Lgr5 expression was not different between all groups. Conclusion(s) In the absence of CHGA, male mice preserved their colonic mucosa integrity and repair potential, while female mice suffered significant loss of mucosa integrity and repair potential during colitis. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".