#2989 SELECTIVE RENAL DISPOSITION OF THE CALCINEURIN INHIBITORS VOCLSOPORIN, CYCLOSPORINE, AND TACROLIMUS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background and Aims The calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine (CSA) and tacrolimus (TAC) were revolutionary immunosuppressants when first introduced for solid organ transplantation in the 1980s. Voclosporin (VCS), a novel CNI, recently became the first oral therapy approved in the United States, Great Britain, and Europe for the treatment of active lupus nephritis based on positive results from Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Unlike CSA and TAC, VCS has demonstrated a consistent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, eliminating the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. Further, VCS is associated with a more favorable metabolic profile and has not been associated with electrolyte disturbances. Emerging evidence indicates small molecule therapeutics may display differential disposition within organ tissues. This suggests that CNIs may be differentially distributed and retained in the kidney, potentially explaining the difference in their efficacy and safety profiles. To evaluate renal disposition of CSA, TAC, and VCS, we assessed in mice and humans the disposition of each CNI in the kidney relative to its systemic drug exposure. Method Single 30 mg/kg doses of CSA, TAC and VCS were administered intravenously to mice. Following intravenous administration, kidneys were collected at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −20 °C until sectioning. Sections of 10 μm kidney tissue were mounted on indium tin oxide coated glass slides. Matrix of 10 mg/mL α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 85% acetonitrile/13% ethanol + 2% water + 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid was sprayed on the tissue using an HTX tissue sprayer, dried for 10 minutes in the vacuum, and subjected to Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption and Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MALDI-MSI). The systemic and renal clearance in humans of CSA and TAC were obtained from the literature; pharmacokinetic data on VCS was obtained from data on file. Renal secretion of each drug was compared to its expected passive filtration based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR), fraction unbound in plasma (fu), and respective systemic drug exposure. Results MALDI-MSI demonstrated significantly higher concentrations of drug and more diffuse tissue disposition of CSA in mouse kidney compared to VCS (Figure 1). CSA was retained in all kidney tissues up to 2 hours post-administration. Higher concentrations and more diffuse disposition of TAC was also noted compared to VCS at 15 and 30 minutes; TAC was distinctively retained in the cortex and medulla. VCS had moderate distribution in the cortex and was rapidly excreted with low levels of drug present in the kidney after 1 hour. According to published data, CSA has a measured renal clearance of 1.48 mL/min in healthy human subjects, representing approximately 10% of expected passive filtration of 12.5 mL/min (Table 1). TAC has a renal clearance of 0.014 mL/min representing <2% of expected passive filtration of 1.25 mL/min. VCS has a renal clearance of 7.82 mL/min representing approximately 200% of its expected passive filtration rate of 3.75 mL/min. Conclusion MALDI-MSI revealed differential retention and distribution of CSA, TAC and VCS in mice, consistent with their respective renal clearances in humans. Higher drug exposure and >90% renal reabsorption was observed for both CSA and TAC in this study, whereas the renal handling of VCS suggested a significant component of tubular secretion. The higher rate of secretion and lower overall exposure of kidney tissue to VCS may be associated with an improved safety profile when compared to the more diffuse distribution and greater renal retention of CSA and TAC.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».