#2989 SELECTIVE RENAL DISPOSITION OF THE CALCINEURIN INHIBITORS VOCLSOPORIN, CYCLOSPORINE, AND TACROLIMUS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims The calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine (CSA) and tacrolimus (TAC) were revolutionary immunosuppressants when first introduced for solid organ transplantation in the 1980s. Voclosporin (VCS), a novel CNI, recently became the first oral therapy approved in the United States, Great Britain, and Europe for the treatment of active lupus nephritis based on positive results from Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Unlike CSA and TAC, VCS has demonstrated a consistent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, eliminating the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. Further, VCS is associated with a more favorable metabolic profile and has not been associated with electrolyte disturbances. Emerging evidence indicates small molecule therapeutics may display differential disposition within organ tissues. This suggests that CNIs may be differentially distributed and retained in the kidney, potentially explaining the difference in their efficacy and safety profiles. To evaluate renal disposition of CSA, TAC, and VCS, we assessed in mice and humans the disposition of each CNI in the kidney relative to its systemic drug exposure. Method Single 30 mg/kg doses of CSA, TAC and VCS were administered intravenously to mice. Following intravenous administration, kidneys were collected at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour and 2 hours, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −20 °C until sectioning. Sections of 10 μm kidney tissue were mounted on indium tin oxide coated glass slides. Matrix of 10 mg/mL α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in 85% acetonitrile/13% ethanol + 2% water + 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid was sprayed on the tissue using an HTX tissue sprayer, dried for 10 minutes in the vacuum, and subjected to Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption and Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MALDI-MSI). The systemic and renal clearance in humans of CSA and TAC were obtained from the literature; pharmacokinetic data on VCS was obtained from data on file. Renal secretion of each drug was compared to its expected passive filtration based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR), fraction unbound in plasma (fu), and respective systemic drug exposure. Results MALDI-MSI demonstrated significantly higher concentrations of drug and more diffuse tissue disposition of CSA in mouse kidney compared to VCS (Figure 1). CSA was retained in all kidney tissues up to 2 hours post-administration. Higher concentrations and more diffuse disposition of TAC was also noted compared to VCS at 15 and 30 minutes; TAC was distinctively retained in the cortex and medulla. VCS had moderate distribution in the cortex and was rapidly excreted with low levels of drug present in the kidney after 1 hour. According to published data, CSA has a measured renal clearance of 1.48 mL/min in healthy human subjects, representing approximately 10% of expected passive filtration of 12.5 mL/min (Table 1). TAC has a renal clearance of 0.014 mL/min representing <2% of expected passive filtration of 1.25 mL/min. VCS has a renal clearance of 7.82 mL/min representing approximately 200% of its expected passive filtration rate of 3.75 mL/min. Conclusion MALDI-MSI revealed differential retention and distribution of CSA, TAC and VCS in mice, consistent with their respective renal clearances in humans. Higher drug exposure and >90% renal reabsorption was observed for both CSA and TAC in this study, whereas the renal handling of VCS suggested a significant component of tubular secretion. The higher rate of secretion and lower overall exposure of kidney tissue to VCS may be associated with an improved safety profile when compared to the more diffuse distribution and greater renal retention of CSA and TAC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".