P1017: REDUCTIONS IN INDOLENT SYSTEMIC MASTOCYTOSIS BIOMARKER BURDEN WITH AVAPRITINIB IN THE REGISTRATIONAL, DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PIONEER TRIAL
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Topic: 16. Myeloproliferative neoplasms - Clinical Background: Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), a clonal mast cell (MC) disease primarily driven by the KIT D816V mutation, is characterized by abnormal MC accumulation and activation. To date, no therapies have demonstrated disease modification in a controlled trial. PIONEER (NCT03731260) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of avapritinib, a potent, highly selective, oral inhibitor of KIT D816V in patients with symptomatic ISM despite best supportive care (BSC). Recently reported findings (Castells M, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;151(2):AB204) from this trial demonstrated that patients treated with avapritinib achieved significantly greater improvement in patient-reported total symptom scores (TSS) vs placebo after 24 weeks of treatment. Aims: To assess the impact of avapritinib vs placebo on objective biomarkers of MC burden in patients with ISM. Methods: Adult patients with ISM were randomly assigned 2:1 to avapritinib 25 mg QD + BSC (“avapritinib”) or placebo + BSC (“placebo”) groups and stratified by baseline serum tryptase (<20 ng/mL vs ≥20 ng/mL). Endpoints included ≥50% reduction in serum tryptase, bone marrow (BM) MC burden, and KIT D816V variant allele frequency (VAF) in peripheral blood (PB) at 24 weeks. One-sided P-values are reported. Additional analyses included reduction of serum tryptase to <20 ng/mL, total clearance of BM MC aggregates, and reduction of KIT D816V VAF to undetectable levels (<0.02%). Patient-reported outcomes included TSS evaluated using the ISM symptom assessment form (ISM-SAF ©2018). Safety was also assessed. Results: Baseline characteristics for patients in the avapritinib (n=141) and placebo (n=71) groups were similar. In the avapritinib group, baseline median (range) serum tryptase, BM MC burden, and KIT D816V VAF in PB were 38.4 ng/mL (3.6–256.0), 7.0% (1.0–50.0), and 0.4% (0.02–41.3), and in the placebo group were 43.7 ng/mL (5.7–501.6), 7.0% (1.0–70.0), and 0.3% (0.02–36.7). At week 24, a significantly greater proportion of patients in the avapritinib group vs placebo group (all P<0.0001) achieved ≥50% reductions in serum tryptase levels (54% [76/141] vs 0% [0/71]), BM MC burden (53% [56/106] vs 23% [13/57]), and KIT D816V VAF (68% [80/118] vs 6% [4/63]). Reduction of serum tryptase to <20 ng/mL from ≥20 ng/mL at baseline was observed in 54% (58/107; <11.4 ng/mL, n=29; 11.4–<20 ng/mL, n=29) in the avapritinib group vs 2% (11.4–<20 ng/mL, n=1/50) in the placebo group. Mean percent change (SD) BM MC burden was greater with avapritinib vs placebo (–11.3% [84.1] vs 0.4% [69.1]). Of patients with BM MC aggregates at baseline, total clearance of BM MC aggregates was three times more common in the avapritinib group than placebo (36% [n=33/91] vs 12% [n=6/50]). Of patients with detectable KIT D816V VAF at baseline, 11% (n=12/109) in the avapritinib group had undetectable KIT D816V VAF at 24 weeks vs 6% (n=3/54) in the placebo group. In the primary endpoint analysis, the avapritinib group had significantly greater mean change (95% CI) in TSS at 24 weeks vs placebo (–15.6 [–18.6, –12.6] vs –9.2 [–13.1, –5.2]; P=0.003). Avapritinib was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to placebo. Summary/Conclusion: In patients with ISM, avapritinib 25 mg QD significantly reduced objective biomarkers of MC burden, notably improved symptoms, and was well-tolerated. These results support avapritinib as a potentially disease-modifying therapy for patients with ISM.Keywords: c-kit, Systemic mastocytosis, Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».