P1017: REDUCTIONS IN INDOLENT SYSTEMIC MASTOCYTOSIS BIOMARKER BURDEN WITH AVAPRITINIB IN THE REGISTRATIONAL, DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PIONEER TRIAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Topic: 16. Myeloproliferative neoplasms - Clinical Background: Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), a clonal mast cell (MC) disease primarily driven by the KIT D816V mutation, is characterized by abnormal MC accumulation and activation. To date, no therapies have demonstrated disease modification in a controlled trial. PIONEER (NCT03731260) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of avapritinib, a potent, highly selective, oral inhibitor of KIT D816V in patients with symptomatic ISM despite best supportive care (BSC). Recently reported findings (Castells M, et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;151(2):AB204) from this trial demonstrated that patients treated with avapritinib achieved significantly greater improvement in patient-reported total symptom scores (TSS) vs placebo after 24 weeks of treatment. Aims: To assess the impact of avapritinib vs placebo on objective biomarkers of MC burden in patients with ISM. Methods: Adult patients with ISM were randomly assigned 2:1 to avapritinib 25 mg QD + BSC (“avapritinib”) or placebo + BSC (“placebo”) groups and stratified by baseline serum tryptase (<20 ng/mL vs ≥20 ng/mL). Endpoints included ≥50% reduction in serum tryptase, bone marrow (BM) MC burden, and KIT D816V variant allele frequency (VAF) in peripheral blood (PB) at 24 weeks. One-sided P-values are reported. Additional analyses included reduction of serum tryptase to <20 ng/mL, total clearance of BM MC aggregates, and reduction of KIT D816V VAF to undetectable levels (<0.02%). Patient-reported outcomes included TSS evaluated using the ISM symptom assessment form (ISM-SAF ©2018). Safety was also assessed. Results: Baseline characteristics for patients in the avapritinib (n=141) and placebo (n=71) groups were similar. In the avapritinib group, baseline median (range) serum tryptase, BM MC burden, and KIT D816V VAF in PB were 38.4 ng/mL (3.6–256.0), 7.0% (1.0–50.0), and 0.4% (0.02–41.3), and in the placebo group were 43.7 ng/mL (5.7–501.6), 7.0% (1.0–70.0), and 0.3% (0.02–36.7). At week 24, a significantly greater proportion of patients in the avapritinib group vs placebo group (all P<0.0001) achieved ≥50% reductions in serum tryptase levels (54% [76/141] vs 0% [0/71]), BM MC burden (53% [56/106] vs 23% [13/57]), and KIT D816V VAF (68% [80/118] vs 6% [4/63]). Reduction of serum tryptase to <20 ng/mL from ≥20 ng/mL at baseline was observed in 54% (58/107; <11.4 ng/mL, n=29; 11.4–<20 ng/mL, n=29) in the avapritinib group vs 2% (11.4–<20 ng/mL, n=1/50) in the placebo group. Mean percent change (SD) BM MC burden was greater with avapritinib vs placebo (–11.3% [84.1] vs 0.4% [69.1]). Of patients with BM MC aggregates at baseline, total clearance of BM MC aggregates was three times more common in the avapritinib group than placebo (36% [n=33/91] vs 12% [n=6/50]). Of patients with detectable KIT D816V VAF at baseline, 11% (n=12/109) in the avapritinib group had undetectable KIT D816V VAF at 24 weeks vs 6% (n=3/54) in the placebo group. In the primary endpoint analysis, the avapritinib group had significantly greater mean change (95% CI) in TSS at 24 weeks vs placebo (–15.6 [–18.6, –12.6] vs –9.2 [–13.1, –5.2]; P=0.003). Avapritinib was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to placebo. Summary/Conclusion: In patients with ISM, avapritinib 25 mg QD significantly reduced objective biomarkers of MC burden, notably improved symptoms, and was well-tolerated. These results support avapritinib as a potentially disease-modifying therapy for patients with ISM.Keywords: c-kit, Systemic mastocytosis, Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".