MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4385856750 · doi:10.1097/01.hs9.0000972776.91875.6f

P1473: CLINICALLY RELEVANT HEMOGLOBIN RESPONSE IN ADULTS WITH PYRUVATE KINASE DEFICIENCY TREATED WITH MITAPIVAT – A SUB-ANALYSIS OF THE ACTIVATE TRIAL

2023· article· en· W4385856750 sur OpenAlexaff
Hanny Al‐Samkari, Rachael F. Grace, Andreas Glenthøj, Wilma Barcellini, Madeleine Verhovsek, Jennifer Rothman, Marta Morado, Mark Layton, Oliver Andrés, F. Galactéros, Koichi Onodera, Satheesh Chonat, Rengyi Xu, Bryan McGee, Melissa Dibacco, Jaime Morales, Eduard J. van Beers

Notice bibliographique

RevueHemaSphere · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueBiochemical and Molecular Research
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAnemiaHemoglobinHemolysisClinical endpointPyruvate kinasePlaceboPyruvate kinase deficiencyInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialGastroenterologyClinical trialPharmacologyGlycolysisPathologyMetabolism

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Topic: 28. Enzymopathies, membranopathies and other anemias Background: Mitapivat, an oral, allosteric activator of pyruvate kinase (PK), is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of hemolytic anemia in adults with PK deficiency and by the EMA for the treatment of PK deficiency in adults. In the ACTIVATE trial (NCT03548220), mitapivat demonstrated improvements in hemoglobin (Hb) in patients (pts) who were not regularly transfused. 16/40 (40%) pts receiving mitapivat met the primary endpoint of Hb response (≥1.5 g/dL increase from baseline [BL] sustained at ≥2 scheduled assessments at weeks [wks] 16, 20, and 24 in the fixed-dose period) compared with 0 for placebo (PBO). Understanding Hb response using a clinically applicable definition of ≥1.0 g/dL improvement after mitapivat treatment may provide additional benefits. Aims: This analysis examined Hb, hemolysis, and disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) responses to mitapivat during ACTIVATE and/or the long-term extension (LTE) (NCT03853798) in pts who had a ≥1.0 g/dL Hb increase. Methods: In the global, phase 3, randomized, PBO-controlled ACTIVATE trial, 80 pts were randomized 1:1 to receive mitapivat or PBO for a 12-wk dose-optimization period (5/20/50 mg twice daily), followed by a 12-wk fixed-dose period. This analysis included pts treated with mitapivat in ACTIVATE who continued into the LTE and had a clinically relevant Hb response defined as ≥1.0 g/dL increase from BL for at least 2 timepoints after the start of the fixed-dose period. Hemolysis was evaluated through bilirubin and reticulocyte analyses. Quality of life was evaluated by using the PRO measures, PK deficiency diary (PKDD) and PK deficiency impact assessment (PKDIA); for both, a lower score represents lower disease burden. The minimal clinically important change (MCIC) is defined as a reduction of 4.2 and 5.5 in PKDD and PKDIA scores, respectively. Results: 25/40 (62.5%) pts originally randomized to mitapivat in ACTIVATE/LTE met the criteria for having a clinically relevant Hb response (≥1.0 g/dL) which occurred as early as 20 wks and as late as 108 wks. Median (Q1, Q3) Hb improvement from BL to Wk 108 was 2.6 g/dL (1.17, 3.27; n=19) (Figure). This group included a subset of 9 pts who did not meet original protocol endpoint (≥1.5 g/dL increase in Hb). For this subset, median (Q1, Q3) Hb improvement from BL at Wk 108 was 1.07 g/dL (0.69,1.92; n=8). 19/25 pts meeting the criteria for clinically relevant Hb response had a ≥1.5 g/dL Hb increase on ≥2 timepoints after the start of the fixed-dose period, of which 16 achieved this by Wk 24; 3 pts achieved ≥1.5 g/dL Hb improvement after Wk 24 (up to Wk 120). Median (Q1, Q3) change from BL to Wk 108 in bilirubin was -30.1 µmol/L (-55.15, -19.20; n=17) and in reticulocyte % was -8.3% (-19.2%, -2.8%; n=18). Improvements in hemolysis markers were similar in the subset of 9 who did not meet original protocol endpoint. At Wk 108, mean (95% CI) changes from BL in PKDD and PKDIA scores were -7.2 (-11.1, -3.2; n=15) and -7.3 (-10.8, -3.8; n=17), respectively (Figure). For the subset of 9 pts, mean (95% CI) changes from BL in PKDD and PKDIA scores were -6.1 (-14.6, 2.3; n=4) and -6.2 (-15.5, 3.2; n=6), respectively. Summary/Conclusion: This analysis shows that a majority of pts treated with mitapivat in ACTIVATE/LTE (62.5%) achieved a clinically relevant Hb response, defined as a Hb increase of ≥1.0 g/dL, along with improvements in hemolysis and PROs, indicating beneficial effects to pts with PK deficiency. Further, some Hb responses ≥1.0 g/dL occurred after 6 months, indicating that certain pts may reach this threshold with continued treatment regardless of initial Hb response.Keywords: Hemolysis, Pyruvate kinase deficiency, Hemolytic anemia, Hemoglobin

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,143
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,527

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,272
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHemaSphereMême sujetBiochemical and Molecular ResearchTravaux en français237 207