MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4389230816 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-188739

Treatment of Bleeding Episodes with Efanesoctocog Alfa in Children with Severe Hemophilia A in the XTEND-Kids Phase 3 Study

2023· article· en· W4389230816 sur OpenAlexaff
Lynn Malec, Amy L. Dunn, Manuel Carção, Bülent Zülfikar, Rubén Berrueco, Simon Brown, Umer Khan, Sriya Gunawardena, Graham Neill, Lydia Abad‐Franch, Linda Bystrická, Elena Santagostino, Sophie Susen

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemophilia Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineInternal medicineVon Willebrand factorSurgeryGastroenterologyPediatricsPlatelet

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Efanesoctocog alfa (formerly BIVV001) is a new class of high sustained factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy, composed of a single recombinant FVIII protein fused to dimeric Fc protein, 2 XTEN polypeptides, and the D'D3 domain of von Willebrand factor (VWF), designed to overcome the endogenous VWF-imposed half-life ceiling. The XTEND-Kids (NCT04759131) study demonstrated once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa was well tolerated and provided effective treatment of and protection from bleeds in previously treated patients <12 years old with severe hemophilia A. Here, we provide a detailed report on efanesoctocog alfa as a treatment for bleeds during XTEND-Kids. Methods Previously treated patients <12 years old (≥150 exposure days [EDs] for patients 6 to <12 years of age and ≥50 EDs for patients <6 years old) with severe hemophilia A (<1 IU/dL [<1%] endogenous FVIII activity or a documented genotype associated with severe hemophilia) received efanesoctocog alfa 50 IU/kg once weekly for 52 weeks. In line with the study protocol, bleeds were treated with a single dose of efanesoctocog alfa (50 IU/kg). Additional doses (30 or 50 IU/kg, every 2-3 days) could be considered if needed. For minor/moderate bleeds occurring within 2-3 days of a recent prophylactic dose, a 30 IU/kg dose could also be used. The number and location of bleeds, as well as dose and number of efanesoctocog alfa injections required to resolve them were recorded. Patient assessment of the response to the first injection for treating a bleed was evaluated using the 4-point International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) scale (excellent, good, moderate, and none). Results Of 74 patients in XTEND-Kids, 73 were included in these post hoc analyses, including 38 subjects <6 years of age. One subject in the 6 to <12 group was excluded from these analyses as he did not receive weekly prophylaxis treatment as specified in the protocol, instead receiving intense consolidation treatment (2-3 injections per week for ~4 months) following 2 traumatic self-reported hip bleeds (however, no signs of bleeding or joint damage were observed by magnetic resonance imaging during the consolidation treatment period). The mean (SD) total number of EDs was 52.3 (6.83) for the overall population. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) estimated annualized bleed rate (ABR) was 0.61 (0.42-0.90). The mean (95% CI) annualized spontaneous, traumatic, and joint bleed rates were 0.16 (0.08-0.31), 0.40 (0.24-0.65), and 0.30 (0.16-0.57), respectively. Eighty-six percent of participants (n=63) had ≤1 bleed, including 64% (n=47) with no overall bleeds; 88% (n=64) had no spontaneous bleeds and 84% (n=61) had no joint bleeds. There were 43 bleeds treated with efanesoctocog alfa, of which 11 were reported as spontaneous (26%), 28 as traumatic (65%), and 4 (9%) were of unknown etiology (Table). The most common locations for bleeds were the joints (n=21, 49%) and skin/mucosa (n=15, 35%). The rate of bleeding events per week throughout the study remained consistently low (Figure). The mean (SD) duration between a treated bleed and nearest injection taken prior to that bleed was 4.7 (1.95) days, with a mean of 4.5 (1.56) days for a spontaneous bleed and 4.8 (2.12) for traumatic bleeds. A single injection was sufficient to resolve 95% of bleeds, and no bleed required more than 2 injections for resolution. The median (interquartile range) total dose required to resolve a bleed was 52.6 (50.0-55.8) IU/kg. Among first injections for bleeding episodes with an evaluation of response by participants (n=37), the vast majority (n=36, 97%) were rated as excellent or good. Conclusions A single dose of efanesoctocog alfa 50 IU/kg resolved 95% of bleeds in children <12 years of age, regardless of type or location. The hemostatic efficacy of efanesoctocog alfa was rated as excellent or good for nearly all evaluated first injections (97%). Once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa provided efficient prophylaxis with no bleeds in 64% of participants, and consistently low ABRs among all types and locations of bleeds. Efanesoctocog alfa provided effective treatment and prevention of bleeds in previously treated children <12 years of age with severe hemophilia A.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,009

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,300 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemophilia Treatment and Research→Travaux en français237 207→