MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389230816 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-188739

Treatment of Bleeding Episodes with Efanesoctocog Alfa in Children with Severe Hemophilia A in the XTEND-Kids Phase 3 Study

2023· article· en· W4389230816 on OpenAlexaff
Lynn Malec, Amy L. Dunn, Manuel Carção, Bülent Zülfikar, Rubén Berrueco, Simon Brown, Umer Khan, Sriya Gunawardena, Graham Neill, Lydia Abad‐Franch, Linda Bystrická, Elena Santagostino, Sophie Susen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemophilia Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineVon Willebrand factorSurgeryGastroenterologyPediatricsPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Efanesoctocog alfa (formerly BIVV001) is a new class of high sustained factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy, composed of a single recombinant FVIII protein fused to dimeric Fc protein, 2 XTEN polypeptides, and the D'D3 domain of von Willebrand factor (VWF), designed to overcome the endogenous VWF-imposed half-life ceiling. The XTEND-Kids (NCT04759131) study demonstrated once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa was well tolerated and provided effective treatment of and protection from bleeds in previously treated patients <12 years old with severe hemophilia A. Here, we provide a detailed report on efanesoctocog alfa as a treatment for bleeds during XTEND-Kids. Methods Previously treated patients <12 years old (≥150 exposure days [EDs] for patients 6 to <12 years of age and ≥50 EDs for patients <6 years old) with severe hemophilia A (<1 IU/dL [<1%] endogenous FVIII activity or a documented genotype associated with severe hemophilia) received efanesoctocog alfa 50 IU/kg once weekly for 52 weeks. In line with the study protocol, bleeds were treated with a single dose of efanesoctocog alfa (50 IU/kg). Additional doses (30 or 50 IU/kg, every 2-3 days) could be considered if needed. For minor/moderate bleeds occurring within 2-3 days of a recent prophylactic dose, a 30 IU/kg dose could also be used. The number and location of bleeds, as well as dose and number of efanesoctocog alfa injections required to resolve them were recorded. Patient assessment of the response to the first injection for treating a bleed was evaluated using the 4-point International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) scale (excellent, good, moderate, and none). Results Of 74 patients in XTEND-Kids, 73 were included in these post hoc analyses, including 38 subjects <6 years of age. One subject in the 6 to <12 group was excluded from these analyses as he did not receive weekly prophylaxis treatment as specified in the protocol, instead receiving intense consolidation treatment (2-3 injections per week for ~4 months) following 2 traumatic self-reported hip bleeds (however, no signs of bleeding or joint damage were observed by magnetic resonance imaging during the consolidation treatment period). The mean (SD) total number of EDs was 52.3 (6.83) for the overall population. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) estimated annualized bleed rate (ABR) was 0.61 (0.42-0.90). The mean (95% CI) annualized spontaneous, traumatic, and joint bleed rates were 0.16 (0.08-0.31), 0.40 (0.24-0.65), and 0.30 (0.16-0.57), respectively. Eighty-six percent of participants (n=63) had ≤1 bleed, including 64% (n=47) with no overall bleeds; 88% (n=64) had no spontaneous bleeds and 84% (n=61) had no joint bleeds. There were 43 bleeds treated with efanesoctocog alfa, of which 11 were reported as spontaneous (26%), 28 as traumatic (65%), and 4 (9%) were of unknown etiology (Table). The most common locations for bleeds were the joints (n=21, 49%) and skin/mucosa (n=15, 35%). The rate of bleeding events per week throughout the study remained consistently low (Figure). The mean (SD) duration between a treated bleed and nearest injection taken prior to that bleed was 4.7 (1.95) days, with a mean of 4.5 (1.56) days for a spontaneous bleed and 4.8 (2.12) for traumatic bleeds. A single injection was sufficient to resolve 95% of bleeds, and no bleed required more than 2 injections for resolution. The median (interquartile range) total dose required to resolve a bleed was 52.6 (50.0-55.8) IU/kg. Among first injections for bleeding episodes with an evaluation of response by participants (n=37), the vast majority (n=36, 97%) were rated as excellent or good. Conclusions A single dose of efanesoctocog alfa 50 IU/kg resolved 95% of bleeds in children <12 years of age, regardless of type or location. The hemostatic efficacy of efanesoctocog alfa was rated as excellent or good for nearly all evaluated first injections (97%). Once-weekly efanesoctocog alfa provided efficient prophylaxis with no bleeds in 64% of participants, and consistently low ABRs among all types and locations of bleeds. Efanesoctocog alfa provided effective treatment and prevention of bleeds in previously treated children <12 years of age with severe hemophilia A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemophilia Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→