MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4398251954 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfae069.716

#2267 IL-33 Inhibition with tozorakimab for diabetic kidney disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2b study

2024· article· en· W4398251954 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink, Alexis Hofherr, Kaisa Mäki-Petäjä, Viknesh Selvarajah, Daniel Grice, Stefano Bartesaghi, Eulalia Jiménez, Nitin Kaila, Roberto Pecoits‐Filho

Notice bibliographique

RevueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueIL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPlaceboMedicineInternal medicinePhase (matter)Randomized controlled trialChemistryAlternative medicinePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aims In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), persistent, low-grade inflammation is a significant risk factor for adverse kidney outcomes. Previously, we identified interleukin-33 (IL-33) as an over-expressed inflammatory cytokine in kidney biopsies from patients with CKD and showed a significant benefit of inhibiting IL-33 signaling in a rodent model of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Here, we investigate the therapeutic potential of tozorakimab, a high-affinity IL-33-neutralizing immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with DKD. Method FRONTIER-1 (NCT04170543) was a phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of tozorakimab in patients with DKD; defined as T2D with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25-75 mL/min/1.73 m2, a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) of 100-3,000 mg/g, and on angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) for > 6 weeks before the treatment period. Participants were randomly assigned to four different doses of tozorakimab or volume-matched placebo, administered subcutaneously every 28 days for 24 weeks. The randomization process was stratified based on region and the use of SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). All participants received 10 mg of dapagliflozin Days 85–168, discontinuing existing SGLT2i if applicable. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of tozorakimab on UACR. A sample size of 565 patients provided at least 80% power to detect a 30% reduction in the change from baseline to week 24 in UACR between each tozorakimab treatment group and placebo. Efficacy endpoints were evaluated in the Per Protocol Population (PPP; initiated dapagliflozin treatment), whereas safety and tolerability were assessed for all dosed participants. Results Between 11 December 2019 and 16 May 2023, we assessed 1,575 patients for eligibility in Argentina, Canada, Chile, Peru, South Korea, Japan, and the United States. 599 (38%) participants were assigned to tozorakimab or placebo. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study was temporarily halted between March and June 2020. This precautionary measure resulted in the discontinuation of 26 participants. Upon resuming, the study incorporated significant modifications to adapt to the pandemic environment. 573 participants (Full Analysis Population) were randomized after the study was restarted: 29.7% were female; their mean age (±SD) was 67 years (±10); mean eGFR was 48 mL/min/1.73 m2 (±15); and the geometric mean UACR was 460 mg/g (coefficient of variation = 151%). Most participants were taking an ACEi (30%) or ARB (65%), and 28% an SGLT2i. 139 participants received placebo, while 96, 91, 95, and 152 participants received 30, 60, 120, and 300 mg tozorakimab, respectively. The baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment groups, and significant target engagement was observed in all dose arms. Tozorakimab was generally well tolerated and the incidences of adverse events (Aes), serious Aes, discontinuations, and death were similar to placebo. Initial evaluation identified 476 participants in the PPP with 109, 81, 80, 72, and 134 on placebo, 30, 60, 120, and 300 mg tozorakimab, respectively. The primary efficacy analysis demonstrated an inhibition of IL-33 signaling but failed to establish a statistically significant difference in UACR reduction between placebo and treatment groups. The median %-change from baseline was –22% (–46%, 24%) in the placebo group and ranged from –23% to –25% in the tozorakimab groups at week 24. Similarly, no significant effect on eGFR was observed. Following study completion, Good Clinical Practice concerns arose at one clinical trial site with 15 participants. The investigation of these issues is ongoing, but significant alterations to the study results are not anticipated. Conclusion This study did not demonstrate a clinically meaningful reduction in UACR with tozorakimab treatment in patients with T2D and CKD. Further investigation is warranted to clarify the role of IL-33 in DKD.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,089
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,248
Écart entre enseignants0,240 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationMême sujetIL-33, ST2, and ILC PathwaysTravaux en français237 207