MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398251954 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfae069.716

#2267 IL-33 Inhibition with tozorakimab for diabetic kidney disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2b study

2024· article· en· W4398251954 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink, Alexis Hofherr, Kaisa Mäki-Petäjä, Viknesh Selvarajah, Daniel Grice, Stefano Bartesaghi, Eulalia Jiménez, Nitin Kaila, Roberto Pecoits‐Filho

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicIL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlaceboMedicineInternal medicinePhase (matter)Randomized controlled trialChemistryAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aims In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), persistent, low-grade inflammation is a significant risk factor for adverse kidney outcomes. Previously, we identified interleukin-33 (IL-33) as an over-expressed inflammatory cytokine in kidney biopsies from patients with CKD and showed a significant benefit of inhibiting IL-33 signaling in a rodent model of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Here, we investigate the therapeutic potential of tozorakimab, a high-affinity IL-33-neutralizing immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with DKD. Method FRONTIER-1 (NCT04170543) was a phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of tozorakimab in patients with DKD; defined as T2D with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 25-75 mL/min/1.73 m2, a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) of 100-3,000 mg/g, and on angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) for > 6 weeks before the treatment period. Participants were randomly assigned to four different doses of tozorakimab or volume-matched placebo, administered subcutaneously every 28 days for 24 weeks. The randomization process was stratified based on region and the use of SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). All participants received 10 mg of dapagliflozin Days 85–168, discontinuing existing SGLT2i if applicable. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of tozorakimab on UACR. A sample size of 565 patients provided at least 80% power to detect a 30% reduction in the change from baseline to week 24 in UACR between each tozorakimab treatment group and placebo. Efficacy endpoints were evaluated in the Per Protocol Population (PPP; initiated dapagliflozin treatment), whereas safety and tolerability were assessed for all dosed participants. Results Between 11 December 2019 and 16 May 2023, we assessed 1,575 patients for eligibility in Argentina, Canada, Chile, Peru, South Korea, Japan, and the United States. 599 (38%) participants were assigned to tozorakimab or placebo. Owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study was temporarily halted between March and June 2020. This precautionary measure resulted in the discontinuation of 26 participants. Upon resuming, the study incorporated significant modifications to adapt to the pandemic environment. 573 participants (Full Analysis Population) were randomized after the study was restarted: 29.7% were female; their mean age (±SD) was 67 years (±10); mean eGFR was 48 mL/min/1.73 m2 (±15); and the geometric mean UACR was 460 mg/g (coefficient of variation = 151%). Most participants were taking an ACEi (30%) or ARB (65%), and 28% an SGLT2i. 139 participants received placebo, while 96, 91, 95, and 152 participants received 30, 60, 120, and 300 mg tozorakimab, respectively. The baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment groups, and significant target engagement was observed in all dose arms. Tozorakimab was generally well tolerated and the incidences of adverse events (Aes), serious Aes, discontinuations, and death were similar to placebo. Initial evaluation identified 476 participants in the PPP with 109, 81, 80, 72, and 134 on placebo, 30, 60, 120, and 300 mg tozorakimab, respectively. The primary efficacy analysis demonstrated an inhibition of IL-33 signaling but failed to establish a statistically significant difference in UACR reduction between placebo and treatment groups. The median %-change from baseline was –22% (–46%, 24%) in the placebo group and ranged from –23% to –25% in the tozorakimab groups at week 24. Similarly, no significant effect on eGFR was observed. Following study completion, Good Clinical Practice concerns arose at one clinical trial site with 15 participants. The investigation of these issues is ongoing, but significant alterations to the study results are not anticipated. Conclusion This study did not demonstrate a clinically meaningful reduction in UACR with tozorakimab treatment in patients with T2D and CKD. Further investigation is warranted to clarify the role of IL-33 in DKD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicIL-33, ST2, and ILC PathwaysFrench-language works237,207