A phase II trial of enzalutamide (Enz) with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) as an androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)–sparing approach for older men with castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC).
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
5089 Background: Older men with prostate cancer who have aging-related conditions are at high risk for adverse events (AEs) from ADT. 5-ARI inhibit the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotesterone and could be synergistic with Enz. In this phase II study, we evaluated Enz and Dutasteride (Dut) or Finasteride (Fin) in lieu of ADT for older men with CSPC who are at risk of AEs from ADT. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥65 years (y); deemed “not fit” by geriatric assessment (GA) or at high risk for side effects from ADT as determined by the treating physician; had metastatic (M1) or non-metastatic (M0) CSPC with a PSA doubling time ≤9 months and testosterone >50ng/dl. Enz 160 mg daily and Dut 0.5mg daily or Fin 5mg daily were administered until disease progression per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 guidelines. The primary study endpoint is PSA progression free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints include time to PSA nadir, absolute PSA nadir and evaluation of safety and toxicity of study treatments per CTCAE V4.0. Results: 43 men enrolled in the study. At study entry, subjects had the following baseline characteristics: median age was 78 y (range 66-94); 93% had ECOG 0-1; 63% had M1 CSPC with 30% of them having high volume disease per CHAARTED criteria; 23% had Gleason ≥ 8 CSPC; median PSA was 11.4 ng/ml (2-145), and median testosterone level was 342 ng/dl (56-639). Baseline GA at study entry showed that 18.6% had Instrumental Activity of Daily Living impairment; 9.8% had recent falls; 52.4% had Short Physical Performance Battery impairment; 40.5% had Older American Resources and Services (OARS) physical health and 31% had OARS medical social support impairments; 11.6% had Geriatric Depression Scale impairments; 65.9% had either Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration or Montreal Cognitive Assessment impairments; and 34.9% had Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 impairments. At a median follow-up of 5.9 y, 23 pts (53%) remained on study treatment and the median PSA PFS has not been reached for the entire group. The median time to PSA nadir was 8.1 months, with median PSA nadir at 0.02 ng/ml (range 0-2.75) and 98% having ≥90% PSA decline. The five most common any grade AE was fatigue (88%), gynecomastia (72%), hot flashes (42%), hypertension (40%), and falls (37%). No subject had treatment-related Grade 4 or 5 AEs. Four (9.3%) subjects withdrew treatment, 21% held treatments and 30.2% reduced dose of treatment due to AEs. Conclusions: The combination treatment with Enz and Dut/Fin appears to have clinical efficacy for older patients with CSPC who are at high risk for AEs from ADT. Clinical trial information: NCT02213107 .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».