A phase II trial of enzalutamide (Enz) with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) as an androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)–sparing approach for older men with castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5089 Background: Older men with prostate cancer who have aging-related conditions are at high risk for adverse events (AEs) from ADT. 5-ARI inhibit the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotesterone and could be synergistic with Enz. In this phase II study, we evaluated Enz and Dutasteride (Dut) or Finasteride (Fin) in lieu of ADT for older men with CSPC who are at risk of AEs from ADT. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥65 years (y); deemed “not fit” by geriatric assessment (GA) or at high risk for side effects from ADT as determined by the treating physician; had metastatic (M1) or non-metastatic (M0) CSPC with a PSA doubling time ≤9 months and testosterone >50ng/dl. Enz 160 mg daily and Dut 0.5mg daily or Fin 5mg daily were administered until disease progression per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 guidelines. The primary study endpoint is PSA progression free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints include time to PSA nadir, absolute PSA nadir and evaluation of safety and toxicity of study treatments per CTCAE V4.0. Results: 43 men enrolled in the study. At study entry, subjects had the following baseline characteristics: median age was 78 y (range 66-94); 93% had ECOG 0-1; 63% had M1 CSPC with 30% of them having high volume disease per CHAARTED criteria; 23% had Gleason ≥ 8 CSPC; median PSA was 11.4 ng/ml (2-145), and median testosterone level was 342 ng/dl (56-639). Baseline GA at study entry showed that 18.6% had Instrumental Activity of Daily Living impairment; 9.8% had recent falls; 52.4% had Short Physical Performance Battery impairment; 40.5% had Older American Resources and Services (OARS) physical health and 31% had OARS medical social support impairments; 11.6% had Geriatric Depression Scale impairments; 65.9% had either Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration or Montreal Cognitive Assessment impairments; and 34.9% had Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 impairments. At a median follow-up of 5.9 y, 23 pts (53%) remained on study treatment and the median PSA PFS has not been reached for the entire group. The median time to PSA nadir was 8.1 months, with median PSA nadir at 0.02 ng/ml (range 0-2.75) and 98% having ≥90% PSA decline. The five most common any grade AE was fatigue (88%), gynecomastia (72%), hot flashes (42%), hypertension (40%), and falls (37%). No subject had treatment-related Grade 4 or 5 AEs. Four (9.3%) subjects withdrew treatment, 21% held treatments and 30.2% reduced dose of treatment due to AEs. Conclusions: The combination treatment with Enz and Dut/Fin appears to have clinical efficacy for older patients with CSPC who are at high risk for AEs from ADT. Clinical trial information: NCT02213107 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".